The media continues to be utter garbage.
NBC and ABC had witnesses willing to state, on the record, re:Epstein crimes, and that didn't meet their 'high journalistic standards'.
However, the second a conservative is appointed to SCOTUS?
"HIGH JOURNALISTIC STANDARDS BE DAMNED!"
NBC and ABC had witnesses willing to state, on the record, re:Epstein crimes, and that didn't meet their 'high journalistic standards'.
However, the second a conservative is appointed to SCOTUS?
"HIGH JOURNALISTIC STANDARDS BE DAMNED!"
I mean...this is all fine and dandy, except...WHY NOT AIR EVERYTHING THEY HAVE NOW?
Now that we know...those were the facts?
Now that we know...those were the facts?
At this point, if any media outlet is holding out on ANYTHING said about Epstein that even came close to be truth, they need to release it.
Because, the ONLY reason they are keeping it secret at this point is to protect their own collective asses, now that Epstein is dead.
Because, the ONLY reason they are keeping it secret at this point is to protect their own collective asses, now that Epstein is dead.
Using these supposed standards, it is questionable if ANY of the Kavanaugh accusers met the 'high standards of journalistic excellence'.
And yes...that includes Ms. Blasey Ford.
But hey, whatever. I mean, we want to give Epstein the benefit of the doubt...
And yes...that includes Ms. Blasey Ford.
But hey, whatever. I mean, we want to give Epstein the benefit of the doubt...
As for the Robach statement...her argument here does not, in any way, correspond to the video.
Either she was lying then, or lying now.
Either she was lying then, or lying now.
And being Captain Obvious: there is no reason to give ABC the benefit of the doubt.
That is the disadvantage of hiring a close Bill Clinton crony to be your lead news anchor.
We should always assume ABC is biased in this regard.
That is the disadvantage of hiring a close Bill Clinton crony to be your lead news anchor.
We should always assume ABC is biased in this regard.
M.I.A.
