Back at work now and going through the September border data that CBP finally released last week.
Anyone else catch that the issue with double-counting MPP respondents as first-time "inadmissibles" seems to have only occurred at El Paso? Other sectors seem unaffected.
Anyone else catch that the issue with double-counting MPP respondents as first-time "inadmissibles" seems to have only occurred at El Paso? Other sectors seem unaffected.
El Paso Sector's August inadmissibles data, as first reported in September.
Family units: 2,516
UACs: 106
Single Adults: 1,728
Cubans (out of the above): 944
Here's the data now, after correction:
Family units: 2,002
UACs: 104
Single Adults: 945
Cubans (out of the above): 341
Family units: 2,516
UACs: 106
Single Adults: 1,728
Cubans (out of the above): 944
Here's the data now, after correction:
Family units: 2,002
UACs: 104
Single Adults: 945
Cubans (out of the above): 341
The MPP/Inadmissible double-counting problem in El Paso extends back months, not just in August.
Original July numbers:
Family units: 1,156
UACs: 38
Single Adults: 1,025
Corrected numbers:
Family units: 1,078
UACs: 38
Single Adults: 883
Minor corrections exist in June, too.
Original July numbers:
Family units: 1,156
UACs: 38
Single Adults: 1,025
Corrected numbers:
Family units: 1,078
UACs: 38
Single Adults: 883
Minor corrections exist in June, too.
Deleted a couple of tweets about June being corrected in San Diego because I realized my June data was off in the spreadsheet where I keep this data. Data entry error on my part, whoops.
The problem does appear to have been restricted to El Paso.
The problem does appear to have been restricted to El Paso.
