I'm not sure if rich people are capable of understanding this, since rich people are not often asked to understand anybody's perspective but their own, but their collective, increasingly unhinged *freak out* of @ewarren just makes her policies look all the more necessary.
@ewarren Like, if I'm fighting a witch and someone hands me a glass of water, I'm going to be like "thanks, I'm thirsty, but I'm busy with this witch."
But if the witch sees the water and starts screaming "NO. NOOOOO. Where did you find that CONCOCTION?" I'm gonna start splashing.
But if the witch sees the water and starts screaming "NO. NOOOOO. Where did you find that CONCOCTION?" I'm gonna start splashing.
@ewarren Similarly when Bill Gates -- who I don't even think of as that bad a guy, for a rich man -- can't even extend the courtesy to MEETING with Warren (and this is a man who has sat down with Jeffrey Epstein), it just makes me think "damn, she's got y'all SHOOK."
@ewarren Bottom line, the @WSJopinion was willing to give us the bigotry, sexism, and incompetence of Donald Trump, in order to get what they want.
Telling me they view Warren as 1/100th as *threatening* to them as Trump is threatening to the rest of us is a huge endorsement of her.
Telling me they view Warren as 1/100th as *threatening* to them as Trump is threatening to the rest of us is a huge endorsement of her.
@ewarren @WSJopinion Ugh... just as a PS, I relating how *I* think about using *my* vote which motherfuckers fought and died to get to me.
I still haven't decided, but telling me that candy ass moderates *might not agree* with my policy preferences has NO bearing on how I vote in a primary.
I still haven't decided, but telling me that candy ass moderates *might not agree* with my policy preferences has NO bearing on how I vote in a primary.
@ewarren @WSJopinion I haven't lived my life wondering what *other* people are going to do, or trying to figure out how to make things easy on them, and I'm sure as shit not about to start now. /FIN
