, 12 tweets, 5 min read
My Authors
Read all threads
Morales cancelled a contract with a German company just a week ago. But this was a project supported by the Bolivian government that was arranged in June under Morales. There very well may be a lithium rush now, but it's not helping anyone to misrepresent what happened.
Some more background from yesterday. As both a narrative and an actual thing, 'lithium wars' could dominate the next couple of decades or more, so splitting this out into its own thread.

There were ongoing protests against the plant - locals not trying to shut it down, but wanting a higher dividend payment. Morales claimed the protests were stoked by the right wing ahead of the election (this is from October 8th).
apnews.com/e9a563ddf79643…
So Morales cancelling the project doesn't look to me like refusing to deal with European companies - it was his deal! It looks like a concession made to calm unrest, one that happened only a few days before new elections were called.
More on this. Marco Antonio Pumari is a close associate of Camacho and organised some of the protests against the lithium project. So it is ridiculous to say that the coup happened because the project was cancelled on November 4th. Here they are together: la-razon.com/nacional/Camac…
Here's a dw article on the deal and Pumari going on hunger strike just before the election.
dw.com/en/bolivians-p…
Common Dreams here argues the opposite, that the cancellation of the deal led to the coup:

commondreams.org/news/2019/11/1…
Potosi is a mining town with a militant working class. In August miners were on strike against Sumitomo/ San Cristobal, when the company refused to pay overtime despite a court order.

therealnews.com/stories/bolivi…
So questions from me - if you know more please answer:

1. Was there much genuine working class opposition to the ACI deal in Potosi vs. opportunistic protests from Pumari?

2. Was there any reason Morales cancelled the project other than to try to (unsuccessfully) calm things?
More thoughts on the 'lithium coup' narrative from @triofrancos

@triofrancos A historical parallel with Allende and Pinochet in Chile which I never knew before today: Here's a February 1971 article from the NYT talking about nationalisation of Chile's copper (again, there is no recent nationalisation of Bolivia's lithium reserves). nytimes.com/1971/02/11/arc…
@triofrancos This is often given as one of the drivers of the Pinochet's coup against Allende. However, here's an NYT article from June 1983 about a wildcat strike in Chile's state-owned copper mines. Pinochet never undid the nationalisation. nytimes.com/1983/06/17/wor…
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Enjoying this thread?

Keep Current with libcom dot org

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!