The sheer stupidity of trending #ThanksMughals ! Mughals were invaders, barbarers who killed millions and forcibly converted millions. A very AUTHENTIC (but cursory) list of killings by foreign invaders from AD 636 to 1768 in India by Islamic invaders historyofmuslimattacks.blogspot.com/2013/02/histor… (1)
#ThanksMughals for rapes, massacres, forcible conversions? Hindus were successful after a 1200-year war. It is Marathas who liberated most of India, not British. Read this article for the REAL history of India historyofmuslimattacks.blogspot.com/2013/02/islam-… Know Vijaynagar & other kingdoms (2)
It will be a surprise to most readers who have been fed on the establishment history books to know that it is the Hindus who resisted the onslaught of Arabs for over two centuries (from 636 to 870 AD) unlike the regions west and north of Arabia which succumbed immediately.(3)
It took over 500 years for the Arabs and Turks to lay a foundation for their empire in India (636 AD to 1206 AD) and another two centuries before a stable Empire could be formed after Akbar’s reign (1556-1605) which also perished after a century (Aurangazeb's death in 1707). (4)
It is also a mistake to assume that Arabs ruled India. Actually the Arabs did not rule India except Sindh for 150 years and a small kingdom in Madura for a few years, although many Arab families settled in the country. Rulers were mostly Turks and Afghans & officers from Iran (5)
These foreign rulers considered local converted Muslims as second class Muslims. Aurangzeb for eg often remarked ‘We Turks, you Hindusthanis’ to both Indian Hindus AND MUSLIMS. Even in #Mughal period, 70%+ of senior administrative & military posts were in hands of foreigners (6)
There are only a few instances of local Muslims establishing kingdoms in medieval India like the Sultans of Gujarat and the Nizamshahi of Ahmednagar. Hence there is no substance to the claim by some Indian/Pakistani Muslims that they ruled over India for over a thousand years.(7)
Dr Ambedkar states in his book on Pakistan: “These invasions of India by Muslims were as much invasions of India as they were wars among the Muslims themselves. This fact has remained hidden because the invaders are all lumped together as Muslims without distinction...(contd)"(8)
(...contd) "But as a matter of fact, they were Tartars, Afghans and Mongols...They were not a loving family cemented by the feeling of Islamic brotherhood. They were deadly rivals of one another & their wars were often wars of mutual extermination" wrote Dr Ambedkar...(contd)(9)
Dr Ambedkar continued:"What is, however, important to bear in mind is that with all their internecine conflicts they were all united by one common objective and that was to destroy the Hindu Faith”-wrote Dr Ambedkar in his book "Pakistan or Partition of India"#RapistMughals (10)
Dr Ambedkar states in his book 'Pakistan or Partition of India', “Muhammad of Ghazni ‘demolished idol temples and established Islam. He captured...cities, killed the polluted wretches, destroying the idolaters, and gratifying Muslims...’ (...contd) #RapistMughals (11)
(contd) Ambedkar wrote:"...Muhammad bin Qasim’s first act of religious zeal was forcibly to circumcise the Brahmins of the captured city of Debul...Muhammad Ghazni from the first adopted those plans that would strike terror into the heart of Hindus..."(contd) #RapistMughals (12)
(contd) Ambedkar wrote: "Not infrequently the slaughter of the Hindus gave a great setback to the indigenous culture of the Hindus....Even in the reign of Shah Jahan, we read of the destruction of the temples that the Hindus had started to rebuild..." (contd) #RapistMughals (13)
(contd)Ambedkar "It was left to Aurangzeb to make a final attempt to overthrow idolatry...SLAVERY was the fate of those Hindus who were captured in the holy war. But, WHEN THERE WAS NO WAR THE SYSTEMATIC ABASEMENT OF HINDUS played no unimportant part..."(contd)#RapistMughals (14)
(contd) Ambedkar: "...in the methods adopted by the Muslim invaders...ALL THIS WAS NOT A RESULT OF MERE CAPRICE OR MORAL PERVERSION. On the other hand, what was done was IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULING IDEAS of the leaders of Islam in the broadest aspects.” #RapistMughals (15)
We must quote only AUTHENTIC sources to make our point clear. Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan has compiled Indian history in 11 volumes and the project was financed by the Jawaharlal Nehru Government (who no one can ever accuse of being ‘communal’). #RapistMughals (16)
The chief editor of these 11 volumes was world-famous historian, the late R.C. Majumdar (1888-1980), who was Vice-President of the International Commission set up by UNESCO for the history of mankind and is one of the most respected historians. #RapistMughals (17)
The 11 Volumes on Indian history published by Bhartiya Vidya Bhavan are contributed by many eminent historians, including Muslim historians those from the then East Pakistan (i.e. Bangladesh) and West Pakistan, professors of history in Dhaka, Lahore. #RapistMughals (18)
We simply quote Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan’s 'The History and Culture of the Indian People.' It is hoped that these authentic quotes make everyone (Muslims included) realize the truth of Islam’s spread & atrocities on Hindus. 636 AD-Arabs attacked Thane, near Mumbai[V 3, p 167].(19)
c. 643-Arabs invaded Debol at the mouth of the Sindhu. c. 660-Arabs invaded Sindh. c. 661-680 -Arabs sent 6 expeditions against Sindh.[Vol 3, p 169] 661-680 AD - Arabs sent expeditions against Kabul & Zabul.[V3, p 167] Kabul & Zabul were Hindu kingdoms then in Afghanistan(20)
There were 2 kingdoms, Kabul (then known as Kapisha) & Zabul ruling in Afghanistan. Zabul kingdom lay south of present day Kabul & was ruled by the Hindu dynasty called Shahs or Shahias. Afghanistan, as late as 7th century, formed part of India both politically and culturally(21)
685 AD-The Arabs killed the king of Zabul. 699- The Arabs ravaged Zabul. [Vol 3 p 168] 712- Muhammad-bin-Qasim slaughtered many Hindus, killed King Dahir & captured Sindh & gave settlement to 4,000 Muslims. [Vol 3 p 170] #RapistMughals They followed policy 'convert or kill'(22)
724-738 AD-Arabs sent several expeditions against Gujarat, Jaisalmer, Jodhpur, Broach, Malava, Vallamandal, Ujjain. [Vol 3 p 168] c. 739-Arabs invaded Kathiawar. 776-Arabs sent expedition against Barda, near Porbandar. [Vol 4, p 99] Pulakesan & Lalitaditya defeated them (23)
Elliot & Dawson edited "History of India as told by its own historians" was in 8 volumes. In preface of Vol 1 [published in 1867 in London] on page xxi it is said that "the Muslim rule had common people plunged into the lowest depths of wretchedness and despondency." (24) 
Elliot & Dawson preface of Vol 1 on page xxi continued that the Muslim rule was full of murders and massacres, forcible conversions & marriages, idols mutilated, temples razed, Hindus slain, prohibitions against worship, processions, sensuality & drunkenness of the tyrants! (25)
Swami Vivekananda said: “Hindu population as quoted by Farishta, one of the earliest Muslim historians, was 60 crores (i.e. 600 million) and today [i.e. in 1899 AD] we are only 20 crores (i.e. 200 million)” (Complete Works, Vol 5, p 233) Implies 400+ million Hindus killed! (26)
Well-known historian Dr K S Lal (1920-2002) has written in his book 'Growth of Muslim Population in India' that according to his calculations, the Hindu population in India declined by 80 million from AD 1000 to 1525, perhaps the biggest ever holocaust in human history. (27)
