,
22 tweets,
5 min read
Read on Twitter
Such negationists like Venu who see no threat to Hindus despite fanatical followers of Islam, Christianity vowing to 'finish Hindu religion & end idolatry & polytheism' need to be exposed. Remember, Hindu % has declined EVERYWHERE (India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, SL, Nepal etc) (1)
The Hindu % in India has been constantly reducing right since the first census in 1881, during British times. The Hindu population % in divided India too has already reduced from 85 % in 1951 to 79.8% in 2011 despite Hindus migrating here from Pakistan, Bangladesh etc (2)
In United India the Hindu population was 79% in 1881, down to 73% at the time of Partition in 1947, and is now 66% in 2011. Muslim population rose from 19% in 1881 to 24% at the time of Partition and is 32% now in United India, i.e. in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh together (3)
In United India the Muslim population has risen from 19% in 1881 to 24% at the time of Partition and is 32% now in United India, i.e. in India, Pakistan, Bangladesh together. Had it not been for partition, United India would have become Muslim-majority in few decades from now.(4)
Hindus have reduced from 69% in Kerala in 1901 to 54% in 2011, a whopping 15% decline in a mere 110 years. And this is official. Actually there are many people who have converted to Christianity but remain Hindus officially to get reservation benefits. Is this an RSS bugbear? (5)
Hindu religion was destroyed in West Pakistan i.e. India’s then North West Frontier Province where the Hindu population has come down from 20 % in 1947 to 2%, also in East Pakistan where the Hindu population has come down to 8.6 % in 2011 from 34 % in 1901 & 29 % in 1947 (6)
The ONLY Indian state which saw a similar transfer of population was Punjab where the Muslim % declined after 1947. Apart from that, Muslim % GREW in all other states from 1947 to now eg UP (14% to 19% or so now), Kerala (17% to 26% now), Assam (24% to 34% now) etc. (7)
Hindu religion was also destroyed in Kashmir. No power on earth can prevent Hindus from becoming a minority in United India within 100 years max, partition is the only thing which prevented Hindus from becoming a minority in India & gave Hindus a last chance to survive (8)
At the time of the first census in 1871 in United India under British rule, there was a non-Hindu majority only in the provinces of Sindh, Baluchistan, Kashmir and the North-West Frontier Province. United Bengal and United Punjab both had Muslims in minority. (9)
Hindus incidentally have also declined % wise in Sri Lanka-from 23.2% in 1901 to 12.6% in 2011, and in Nepal from 89.5% in 1981 to 80.62% in 2001 before marginally increasing again to 81.3% in 2011. Hindu % declined in Sri Lanka as well as India, no increase in India or TN (10)
In North-East, the % of Hindus has declined massively. Non-Assam North Eastern (Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Manipur, Mizoram, Tripura & Meghalaya together) states have 53% Hindus in 2011 & 45% Christians. Christians were less than 5% in these states in 1901. RSS bugbear? (11)
Hindus, Buddhists, Sikhs together were 53.71% in 1951 in the part which is today Nagaland and in 2011 they reduced to just 9.6%. In Meghalaya these figures were 73.03% in 1951, reduced to just 21.02% in 2011! This includes Buddhists & Sikhs too, only Hindus are even lesser! (12)
Hindus, Buddhists, Sikhs were 84% in the part which is today the state of Manipur in 1951 from which they declined to a mere 50.2% in 2011. These 50.2% also are not all Hindus. And negationists like The Wire call the threat to Hindus as 'RSS bug-bear'! @Koenraad_Elst (13)
The 'Indian origin-religion people' i.e. Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists & Jains (not all Hindus) were 73.32% in Assam in 1951, from which they declined to 61.88% in 2011. The Muslim % in Assam increased from 24% in 1971 to 34.2% in 2011. Muslim % in Assam was 12% in 1901! (14)
And yet, the sub-text of all 'secularist' commentary is the same, the same as it has been for the past 100 years- it is condemning, demonizing Hindus, expressing concern about 'Hindu communalism', condemning BJP and Sangh Parivar whereas the Hindus are becoming a minority.(15)
In many parts of Tamil Nadu & Andhra Pradesh, Christian %age has increased rapidly (e.g. in Kanyakumari district of Tamil Nadu, the Christians are now 45%) thanks to massive conversion done by the missionaries in the past few decades. 'Seculars' will blame Hindus for this (16)
West Bengal is officially more than 27% Muslim from 18-19% in 1951, and there are lakhs of illegal Bangladeshi Muslims who have settled in the state, making the Muslim population even higher. Violent attacks on Hindus and even Police are now regularly seen in West Bengal (17)
In say, places like Kandhamahal district of Odisha, Christian population has grown from 4% in 1951 officially to more than 18% in 2001 officially & actually much more. timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Rise-in-… 'Seculars' will first dismiss the reality & then blame 'casteist Hindus' for this (18)
In India, Muslims are allowed to marry 4 times while Hindus only once, a suicidal Dodo-type policy. For this benefit of marrying more than once, many Hindus convert to Islam eg ex-Haryana Dy CM Chandra Mohan. High birth rate and #LoveJihad is what results in increasing % (19)
Even a noted secularist Madhu Limaye said that maybe Hindus are a dying race, though he gave 300 years for this situation to come, but it may come much sooner, in only 200 years at least for divided India, and within 50 years for United India. web.archive.org/web/2012052015… (20)
To save Hindu religion, first the Hindu society has to be made aware of the real danger to it. Declarations from 'secularists' like The Wire, Digvijay Singh etc that there is no danger to Hindus must be refuted with solid facts. This thread gives info of past 150 years (21)
This thread doesn't talk of Afghanistan, Pakistan & Bangladesh becoming Muslim-majority due to forced conversions & cut off from India, which were all Hindu areas & parts of India. It only talks of last 100-150 years, which is enough for anyone to know danger to Hindus (22)
