What if:
1) Multiple prominent presidential candidates were under surveillance as far back as 2015.
2) Some individuals we thought to be victims of surveillance/government overreach were actually inserted into campaigns as part of the operation...
1) Multiple prominent presidential candidates were under surveillance as far back as 2015.
2) Some individuals we thought to be victims of surveillance/government overreach were actually inserted into campaigns as part of the operation...
3) The operation was approved by the highest U.S. executive authority.
4) It included collaboration with foreign intelligence services and governments.
5) NSA domestic surveillance capability was abused to gather intel, as many civil libertarians warned against years ago...
4) It included collaboration with foreign intelligence services and governments.
5) NSA domestic surveillance capability was abused to gather intel, as many civil libertarians warned against years ago...
6) Prominent members of the media and media organizations were employed as auxiliaries.
7) The entire operation itself is not the primary crime of interest, but just a COVERUP intended to conceal something MUCH, larger and far more serious involving members of BOTH parties...
7) The entire operation itself is not the primary crime of interest, but just a COVERUP intended to conceal something MUCH, larger and far more serious involving members of BOTH parties...
Just the tip of the iceberg.
Would this explain the IRRATIONALITY so many Trump critics, media members, and former national security officials? Would the incessant lying, false stories, and desperate attempts to...
Would this explain the IRRATIONALITY so many Trump critics, media members, and former national security officials? Would the incessant lying, false stories, and desperate attempts to...
...undermine the current administration begin to make sense? Would it make the #impeachment (at all cost) mentality of the Democratic leadership understandable?
STAY TUNED
STAY TUNED
