.@RepAdamSchiff: "The courts have long recognized that when a party has relevant evidence within his control which he fails to produce, that failure is going to give rise to that inference that evidence is unfavorable to him...That is what has happened here."
@RepAdamSchiff "Are you allowed to draw an adverse inference" based on the White House's obstruction?
"You're darn right you should draw an adverse inference...But there is no need for inference here. There is just a need for a subpoena."
"You're darn right you should draw an adverse inference...But there is no need for inference here. There is just a need for a subpoena."
@RepAdamSchiff Philbin says that's not so, because of claims of privilege.
But the president didn't actually make those claims of privilege.
But the president didn't actually make those claims of privilege.
