There's "precision medicine" and "rabbit hole medicine"
This report represents the latter. How to collect an avg $8,000/person, do many tests to get lots of abnormal findings (for more testing) and "health outcome and benefits were not measured" pnas.org/content/early/… @PNASNews
This report represents the latter. How to collect an avg $8,000/person, do many tests to get lots of abnormal findings (for more testing) and "health outcome and benefits were not measured" pnas.org/content/early/… @PNASNews
@PNASNews My colleague @evanmuse and I wrote about this @TheLancet recently thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/…
"High-dimensional data for a human being is an alluring
yet unproven concept; "there is no validation..in the clinic"
@ScrippsRTI @scrippsresearch
"High-dimensional data for a human being is an alluring
yet unproven concept; "there is no validation..in the clinic"
@ScrippsRTI @scrippsresearch
@PNASNews @EvanMuse @TheLancet @ScrippsRTI @scrippsresearch Here's the previous report from the same group on "precision medicine" which I label (IMO more precisely) "rabbit-hole medicine." Of 209 people, >33% underwent additional medical imaging due to incidental findings pnas.org/content/pnas/1…
@PNASNews
@PNASNews
@PNASNews @EvanMuse @TheLancet @ScrippsRTI @scrippsresearch On deep phenotyping by @segal_eran @WeizmannScience in @NatureOutlook
nature.com/articles/d4158…
"The type and depth of the data collected should be relevant to the disease being studied."
nature.com/articles/d4158…
"The type and depth of the data collected should be relevant to the disease being studied."
