The search for the elusive middle ground. @gabyhinsliff calls for debate ✅...theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
But misses the mark on the issues ❌
Its not about "exceptional circumstances" 🙄 it's about upholding the exception that allows males to be excluded in general from 🚺spaces
But misses the mark on the issues ❌
Its not about "exceptional circumstances" 🙄 it's about upholding the exception that allows males to be excluded in general from 🚺spaces
Is it the "cruelist of personal repudiations" to say this space/ service/ job is single sex (because of other people's bodily privacy) and expect people of the opposite sex (whatever their gender identity) to respect that?
Gaby suggests it's all good. But she's coy about the questions.
"Absorb gender questioning pupils"? Of course! The Q is should males be allowed in girls showers etc
"Unisex loos" ? Fine (in addition to single sex ) The Q is should males have right to be in 🚺 facilities?
"Absorb gender questioning pupils"? Of course! The Q is should males be allowed in girls showers etc
"Unisex loos" ? Fine (in addition to single sex ) The Q is should males have right to be in 🚺 facilities?
@gabyhinsliff if you want to understand what you are writing about read @RebeccaMKBull 's briefing on the law and single sex services . Read @K_IngalaSmith on risk assessment
womansplaceuk.org/2019/11/25/why…
womansplaceuk.org/2019/11/25/why…
