But she misrepresents the core issues.
Thread.
theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
1/
Both males as a group (however they gender identify) and trans activism as an ideology threaten women's safety/rights.
Women do not threaten safety/rights of trans people.
2/
Really?
Males as a group pose a risk to females as a group, however they gender identify. That's a fact.
Should Jessica Yaniv have been allowed to insist female beauticians wax "her" balls?
3/
Cruel to keep all-women shortlists created to address sex disparity as female-only?
Cruel to exclude males with irreversible post-puberty male advantage from female sports?
4/
Not all males are abusive. Risk assessment cannot predict which males are abusive. That's why we have single-sex spaces.
Survivors of male abuse need male-free spaces & services.
5/
We support children questioning socially constructed gender norms/codes.
What we oppose is children being taught that their bodies are "wrong" if they don't conform to the gender stereotypes foisted on the 2 sexes.
6/
I doubt it.
Unisex loos are an issue because they are dangerous for women and girls.
Here is robust evidence:
womansplaceuk.org/gender-neutral…
That's why we need single-sex facilities.
7/
I suggest @Womans_Place_UK @nia_endingVAWG @FiLiA_charity for starters.
It seems a shame to have a platform in @Guardian and not use it to correct the misinformation and victim-blaming smears.