This is one my favorite arguments!
There are NO eyewitnesses BESIDES the eyewitnesses!
I’d love to see this tried in a court of law: “The prosecution has produce no witness except the witnesses it produced! Also no DNA evidence, besides the DNA evidence!”
ETC.
There are NO eyewitnesses BESIDES the eyewitnesses!
I’d love to see this tried in a court of law: “The prosecution has produce no witness except the witnesses it produced! Also no DNA evidence, besides the DNA evidence!”
ETC.
This is a MAGIC BULLET for any argument!
“You have produced ABSOLUTELY ZERO EVIDENCE, DISCOUNTING THE EVIDENCE YOU PRODUCED (which may be discounted BECAUSE REASONS)."
“You have produced ABSOLUTELY ZERO EVIDENCE, DISCOUNTING THE EVIDENCE YOU PRODUCED (which may be discounted BECAUSE REASONS)."
Of course, magic bullets shoot both ways, so if anyone uses this, feel free to reply
“You have produced absolutely no evidence that I have produced absolutely no evidence, nor can you, since any and all evidence produced (by your rule) is to be discounted.”
“You have produced absolutely no evidence that I have produced absolutely no evidence, nor can you, since any and all evidence produced (by your rule) is to be discounted.”
The mental gymnastics that one has to attain to reach “showing evidence discredits the evidence shown, so EVIDENCE FOR P, is actually NOT EVIDENCE FOR P, since evidence has the property of being self-discrediting."
Everyday, Twitter astonishes me with new depths of stupidity.
If it weren’t for the WONDER I feel at these absurdities, I’d go mad from despair over the human condition.
If it weren’t for the WONDER I feel at these absurdities, I’d go mad from despair over the human condition.
