(Ditchley's list of Governors: ditchley.com/people/governo… makes it quite clear all references to "#elites" in his speech are with a nod and a wink...)
No sackcloth and ashes, nor any real acceptance of #responsibility by the (now) Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, despite a pretty accurate description 👇 of what's happened - in large part - during his time in Government...
A grand, arguably grandiose, framing that feints at (but ultimately falls short of promising) a new #NewDeal, on #FDR's #Democratic model.
Themes we've heard time and again: locating the business of Gov't outside the Westminster/Whitehall #bubble; #reform (24 references) and...
If the Gov't & @10DowningStreet want #trust, they'll have to do a LOT better, and FAST. We don't want to have to keep #suing for information that should be published!
(As have so many others; ignoring the inconvenient truth that it's only richly-detailed, linked, identifiable #PersonalData that's of any real value)
Forgive my cynicism. There are words, even aspirations, in this speech I could agree with.
But they are fatally undermined by knowledge of the now rapidly unfolding agenda that - to those paying close attention - is shaping up far less like a '#NewDeal' & more like a #firesale.
In anticipation of the much delayed #digitalIDcards "#NationalConversation", here are some questions on consequential issues that any good #consultation would cover...
[N.B. It ain't a conversation if you stick your fingers in your ears, go la-la-la, and ignore certain topics!]
1) What decisions can be made by those aged 13-16?
ID Minister @darrenpjones already admitted it'll be a #lifelong #IDscheme – for ONE baby to have a #digitalID, the system must be architected for ALL to have one – but when will children be required to *use* them, and for what?
@darrenpjones 2) Will the #IDcard (or an entry in the federated* ID database) describe the holder’s #genitals?
*There won't be a monolithic National Identity Register like @ukhomeoffice built last time – instead your details will be spread around government, linked by your unique #IDnumber...
Nah. This is another puff piece on the #WaitingList pilot, details of which @NHSEngland published - without daring to mention @PalantirTech - over ten months ago...
To be clear, 30 individual NHS Trusts* are using #Palantir#Foundry to manage elective care waiting lists, not patients' entire medical histories - largely by what Ministers have called "cleansing" the data:
Why is this so important? Because #SharedCareRecords - which every new #ICS* is supposed to have - include your #GPdata, which @NHSEngland has been trying to get hold of for years (most recently last summer)...
So let’s talk about where things got up to with your #HealthData, before Rishi Sunak started talking about the need to generate trust in Government with “#integrity” and “#accountability”…
N.B. The chair of NHS Digital announced today’s meeting would be the last public meeting of the Board...
With the news that the Government is rushing through @NHSEngland’s takeover of the statutory safe haven (@NHSDigital) with about the level of planning that went into the 'fiscal event', where exactly *are* things as the former/new Sec State starts work?
First, beginning on page 158, are some Directions that @NHSEngland must know will be HIGHLY controversial - given they are telling @NHSDigital to use @PalantirTech's #Foundry to collect *patient level identifiable data* from hospitals...
I'll tweet as I do a read-through, but even these first two paragraphs are incoherent, e.g. "...in a way that will enable." Enable what?
And if @NHSEngland Directs NHSD to use #Palantir, NHSE is *determining the purposes and means of processing* - i.e. it is a #DataController...