I'm tired, I need some downtime, but drafting this ethics complaint against #RudyGiuliani may just be the most cathartic paperwork I've ever filled out. Who knows if it will do any good, but we have to try.
Dear Members of the Departmental Disciplinary Committee:

On November 11th, 2020, at approximately 1:30 PM ET, I witnessed the above-referenced Rudolph (“Rudy”) William Louis Giuliani appear before the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania...
in the matter of Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. v. Boockvar, 4:20-CV-02078. I witnessed this hearing telephonically, using the District Court’s audio-conferencing system.

During the course of said arguments, Mr. Giuliani made numerous false statements to...
...United States District Judge Matthew W. Brann. These actions were an apparent violation of Mr. Giuliani’s duty of candor to the tribunal pursuant to Rule 3.3(a)(1) of the New York Rules of Professional Conduct.
Although these infractions occurred in a Federal court in Pennsylvania, this committee retains jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 8.5. First, the committee retains jurisdiction under Rule 8.5(a) to discipline an attorney regardless of where their conduct occurs.
Second, at the time of writing, it appears that Mr. Giuliani was suspended from the District of Columbia Bar for non-payment of fees. As such, it would appear that Mr. Giuliani is subject to this committee’s jurisdiction under Rule 8.5(b)(2)...
...as he is licensed in no state other than New York and because his office of record is within the state.

Turning to Mr. Giuliani’s false statements, he specifically breached his duty of candor by falsely stating:
•The he, Mr. Giuliani, was a member in good standing of the Bar for the District of Columbia. His membership, as noted above, was actually suspended.
•That there was widespread, national voter fraud during the 2020 presidential election.
•That hundreds of thousands of ballots in Pennsylvania were counted without Republican observers.
•That over 1,000,000 votes were cast illegally in Pennsylvania.
•That Mr. Biden and his campaign “stole” an election.
•That elections officials engaged in mafia like activity
While I recognize that Mr. Giuliani is a senior member of the bar with a history of public service, his experience should require him to meet a higher standard, not excuse behavior that would be readily sanctioned in a more junior attorney.
I urge you to show all New Yorkers that our ethical rules will be applied against all attorneys, even those who are powerful, prominent, and politically well connected.

Sincerely,
Albert Fox Cahn, Esq.
Drafting the ethics complaint against Rudy felt good. Writing this piece about it for @thedailybeast felt even better. 😁

thedailybeast.com/its-time-to-ta…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Albert Fox Cahn🔯 (He/Him)

Albert Fox Cahn🔯 (He/Him) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @FoxCahn

17 Nov
#Pennsylvania oral arguments in the Trump Election litigation are beginning! And Rudy Guliani is being asked to confirm his bar membership. Will do a blow-by-blow
#Election2020results
Judge is warning counsel to take turns speaking and providing other logistical details. Also going over the revisions to the complaint and the remaining counts
Rudy conceded the loss of standing on the Due Process counts, so only proceeding on the equal protection claims. Just started his opening, and out the gate alleging "widespread, nationwide voter fraud." He's citing Jimmy Carter, Rahm Emanuel, etc. to say mail voting is vulnerable
Read 20 tweets
16 Aug
@tanzinavega (1) Tanzina, it’s a hugely important issue, and I certainly can’t speak for other activists and civil rights organizers, but here are a few responses. Each of these shootings is heartbreaking. truly, and that can’t be lost in the broader public policy debate.
@tanzinavega (2) One of the things we need is to better understand how crime is changing on the ground this year. Most of the data we have comes from police department themselves, giving departments tremendous power to shape the data that drives the public safety narrative.
@tanzinavega (3) sadly, it’s impossible to know how much violent crime has increased in NYC. In the past, I’ve seen officers and detectives go to great lengths to re-classify offenses and improve crime stats. But right now the department is strongly invested in selling the narrative of chaos.
Read 7 tweets
1 Aug
(1) Hey @Brkfldproprtl, looks like you just installed a terrifying #biometric #surveillance system in my building without notice or consent.

First off, when you subject tenants to disturbingly invasive surveillance systems, you might want to, you know, ask if we agree. 😡
(2) Next, the fact that I have absolutely no idea what the capabilities of the system are. Does this include #FacialRecognition? Clearly it has both computer vision and thermal imaging, but what else? One person in the lobby says it has mask detection AI, is that true?
(3) Who keeps this data? For how long? Is it routinely shared with police and/or public health authorities? Do you have a #privacy policy, and if so, where is it?

I know not every tenant is a #surveillance expert, but did you think none of us would care?
Read 5 tweets
24 Sep 19
(1) I'll be honest, I had reservations about #impeachment since the start. It's not popular to say on Twitter, but I worry about an electoral backlash when the #Senate likely acquits. But #Trump's #UkraineExtortion is just too much; it's my breaking point. nytimes.com/2019/09/23/us/…
(2) Now we know that Trump personally ordered Mick Mulvaney to freeze $391 million in military aid to #Ukraine right before he pressured Ukrainian President Zelensky dig up dirt on the Bidens. This plot has all the criminal subtlety of a community theater production of Goodfellas
(3) It was bad enough #Trump targeted a political rival's son. It was horrifying he asked a foreign leader to intervene in our election. But now it's clear he turned U.S. military aid to #Ukraine into a shake-down scheme. If this isn't enough, where do we move the goalposts next?
Read 6 tweets
28 Aug 19
(1) I wonder if American audiences fully grasp the enormity of what #BorisJohnson has done by asking the Queen to suspend #Parliament. This is way more extreme than if #Trump asked #MitchMcConnell to delay the Senate session to avoid an unpopular vote. cnn.com/europe/live-ne…
(2) To put this #ConstitutionalCrisis in perspective, you have to remember that the #UK's parliamentary supremacy vests far more power in their legislature than we've ever given to ours. Under the American system, the Constitution is supreme. Under the UK system, Parliament is.
(3) Things have gotten trickier in recent years as #Parliament delegated some power to other institutions: regional assemblies in #Scotland and #NorthernIreland, a Supreme Court (Lords use to be the highest court), and made other structural changes. see: talkingpoliticspodcast.com/blog/2019/168-…
Read 8 tweets
7 Jun 19
(1) I finally got to watch #WhenTheySeeUs, but the news interrupted: a "#terror attack foiled in #TimesSquare." A disturbing headline, but if you look beneath the surface, a very different story emerges, along w/ disturbing parallels to the #CentralPark5 nytimes.com/2019/06/07/nyr…
(2) The first thing that got my attention was prosecutor’s admission that “despite his intentions, he posed no immediate threat.” A man wanted to attack Times Square, but there was no threat? That didn’t make sense. How could such a major attack not be a threat?
(3) Looking at the facts laid out in the criminal complaint, things get a bit clearer. As paragraph 3 says that in "the course of an investigation...[the defendant] bought and received two firearms with obliterated serial numbers from undercover law enforcement officers."
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!