The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant adverse impact on football clubs, though it is important to distinguish between money that has been completely lost to the game and income that has simply been deferred. This thread will analyse what this means for the Premier League.
Many clubs have listed the revenue impact of COVID-19 in their accounts, while others have not quantified the amounts. In the latter case, I have made assumptions consistent with those clubs who have provided figures in order to estimate the impact.
On the face of it, Premier League revenue held up quite well in 2019/20, though there were only 3 months impacted by the pandemic that season, as 4 clubs reported revenue above £400m (#MUFC £509m, #LFC £490m, #MCFC £478m & #CFC £407m), while all but one club was higher than £100m
Furthermore, there were no fewer than 7 English clubs in the top 20 (5 in the top 10) of the Deloitte Money League, which is a global ranking of revenue.  In fact, there were 13 clubs in the top 30 (including #NUFC, who did not share figures with the consultancy).
However, that disguises the fact that all Premier League clubs experienced a decrease in their revenue in 2019/20 – except the 3 clubs that were promoted from the Championship, who were boosted by the lucrative TV deal in the top flight (#AVFC, #NCFC and #SUFC).
Excluding those 3 promoted clubs, revenue for the other 17 clubs dropped £641m (13%) from £4,773m to £4,132m, mainly due to broadcasting, down £683m (25%) to £2,045m, though match day also fell £95m (14%) to £563m. Partly offset by commercial growing £138m (10%) to £1,520m.
The largest revenue decreases in 2019/20 came at #MUFC £118m and #THFC £69m, both of whom were impacted by worse performance in European competitions, followed by #MCFC £57m, #AFC £51m and #WHUFC £51m. In contrast, there were very small falls at #EFC £2m and #BurnleyFC £4m.
Clearly, it is likely that the largest revenue impact in absolute terms would be at the bigger clubs, on account of their higher revenue base. However, in percentage terms, others suffered more, e.g. #AFCB 27%, #WHUFC 27% and #WWFC 19%. Average decline was 13%.
Match day income fell at almost all Premier League clubs, mainly due to playing games behind closed doors from March onwards, with the largest decreases at #MUFC £21m and #AFC £18m. Only 2 clubs saw growth here: #THFC (new stadium boost) and #WWFC (ticket price increase).
The COVID impact on match day income produced £146m lost revenue with the most at #THFC £23m, #MUFC £20m, #MCFC £17m, #AFC £14m and #LFC £13m. Where no figures available in accounts, calculated as revenue divided by games played with fans multiplied by games behind closed doors.
All clubs had lower broadcasting income in 2019/20, though there was a big difference in the size of the reductions. #THFC fell £108m (Champions League last 16 vs final), while #MUFC were down £101m (Europa League vs CL) and #AFC dropped £64m.
The 2019/20 reduction included a rebate to broadcasters, due to disruption to the schedules and an inferior product (no fans), amounting to £160m lost revenue. This was pro-rated based on gross receipts, so highest were at the top 4: #LFC £13m, #MCFC £12m, #MUFC £11m & #CFC £10m.
However, the larger impact on broadcasting income was the deferral of £383m to 2020/21 accounts, as revenue for games played after a club’s accounting close could not be booked in the 2019/20 season. However, clubs have different accounting dates, so the impact was not the same.
Clubs whose accounts closed on 31st May had the largest revenue deferrals, e.g. #WWFC £43m, #AVFC £36m, #LFC £35m and #AFC £34m. In contrast, clubs with 31st July year-end could book all revenue in 2019/20, so nothing has been deferred to 2020/21.
This makes revenue comparisons between Premier League clubs quite tricky, as the figures for clubs with 31st July year-end looked better in 2019/20, while others saw reductions. On the other hand, it will be a different story in 2020/21, when those clubs will see a boost.
In addition, clubs that qualified for Europe had a reduction in TV money. There was a rebate of around 3% to broadcasters, while revenue for games played after the accounting close was deferred to 2020/21. In this way #MCFC had a £3m rebate with £9m revenue slipped to 2020/21.
Commercial revenue increased at 10 Premier League clubs, led by #EFC £35m (once-off £30m USM payment for stadium naming rights option), #AFC £31m (new deals with Emirates and Adidas), #LFC £29m (sponsorship and merchandising uplift) and #THFC £26m (new stadium).
There was little COVID impact on commercial income in 2019/20, thanks to existing contractual arrangements, only amounting to £6m lost and £13m deferred. The effect is likely to have been much higher in the 2020/21 season, as sponsors also struggled in the pandemic.
In total, I estimate that Premier League clubs lost £326m revenue due to COVID in 2019/20, split broadcasting PL £160m, match day £146m, TV Europe £13m and commercial £6m. Largest revenue losses were at #THFC £34m, #MCFC £32m, #MUFC £31m, #LFC £29m, #CFC £22m and #AFC £21m.
In addition, £410m of revenue has been deferred from 2019/20 to 2020/21 accounts. Six clubs will be boosted by more than £30m: #WWFC £46m, #AVFC £36m, #MCFC £35m, #LFC £35m, #AFC £34m and #LCFC £33m. However, 5 clubs have no deferred revenue, including #NUFC, #CPFC & #BurnleyFC.
So the total revenue reduction from COVID in 2019/20 Premier League was £736m, split between £326m lost and £410m deferred to 2020/21. Six clubs saw their 2019/20 revenue reduce by more than £50m: #MCFC £67m, #LFC £63m, #WWFC £58m, #MUFC £56m, #AFC £55m and #THFC £52m.
If we add back the COVID impact, the 2019/20 revenue would increase £736m from £4,507m to £5,243m. Excluding the 3 promoted clubs, it would increase by £666m from £4,132m to £4,798m with 10 of the 17 clubs having year-on-year revenue growth.
Excluding COVID, 2019/20 revenue would have grown £25m (1%) from £4,773m to £4,798m. Both commercial and match day rose, by £157m (11%) and £40m (6%) respectively, though broadcasting was down £171m (6%).
Without COVID, the highest year-on-year revenue growth was #EFC £31m (17%), followed by #LFC £20m (4%), #WWFC £18m (11%) and #LCFC £18m (10%). On the other hand, #MUFC would still have dropped £62m (10%), reflecting Europa League participation.
Of course, the COVID impact will have been much larger in 2020/21, as almost all games were played without fans. I have estimated £1,049m: (a) match day £698m (95% loss); (b) Premier League rebate £97m (media reports); (c) Europe TV £14m (rebate); commercial £240m (15% decrease).
Based on this model, 5 Premier League clubs will have lost more than £100m revenue due to COVID in 2020/21: #MUFC £155m, #THFC £142m, #LFC £123m, #AFC £116m and #MCFC £104m, with #CFC not far behind at £97m. Then, there is a big drop to #WHUFC £39m.
Much of 2020/21 COVID impact is driven by match day, as virtually the whole season was played behind closed doors, so clubs earning a lot from this revenue stream miss out the most, e.g. #THFC £111m (following move to new stadium), #MUFC £104m, #AFC £88m and #LFC £80m.
Similarly, the assumption that 15% of commercial revenue will have been lost in 2020/21 also means that clubs with high sponsorship, advertising and merchandising will lose more from COVID, e.g. #MUFC £42m and #MCFC £37m. In reality, impact likely to vary between clubs.
Part of the total £330m PL rebate to broadcasters was paid in 2019/20 with balance due to be split between 2020/21 and 2021/22. Estimate for 2020/21 is based on media reports with the amount of the rebate depending on league position. Highest are #LFC and #MCFC with £8m each.
UEFA TV money also impacted by COVID rebate to  broadcasters, as matches were delayed and only one leg played in 2019/20 quarter-finals and semi-finals. This was 3.4% for the Champions League and 3.0% for the Europa League, so assumed same for 2020/21. Highest #CFC & #MCFC £4m.
Based on these assumptions, Premier League clubs will have lost £1.4 bln over past 2 seasons (2019/20 £326m, 2020/21 £1,049m), split between match day £844m, broadcasting £284m & commercial £246m. Excludes £410m revenue deferred from 2019/20, as this is only a timing difference.
Over the past 2 seasons, the largest estimated COVID loss was £187m at #MUFC; followed by #THFC £176m, #LFC £152m, #AFC £137m, #MCFC £136m and #CFC £120m. Maybe something for fans to consider when they agitate for their club to splash the cash to sign new players.
There is no doubt that COVID has had a major negative impact on revenue, though accounting technicalities (i.e. different year-ends) mean that clubs were affected to a greater or lesser extent in 2019/20 figures. In many cases, deferred revenue will enhance 2020/21 financials.
That said, the size of the PL losses really should give pause for thought, so I’ll say it again: £1.4 bln over the past two seasons. In that period, 6 clubs have lost more than £120m, Although losses are smaller outside the Big Six, they are still significant in percentage terms.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Swiss Ramble

Swiss Ramble Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SwissRamble

6 Sep
Many Liverpool fans are unhappy that their club has not bought more players in this summer’s transfer window. This thread looks at where the money has gone, reviews the #LFC business model under FSG and explains why the approach is less restrained at other clubs.
This summer #LFC only spent £36m on RB Leipzig defender Ibrahim Konaté, by far the lowest of the Big Six. Four clubs splashed out more than £100m:#AFC £149m, #MUFC £126m, #MCFC £115m and #CFC £108m. On a net basis, #LFC £11m was second smallest, as #CFC made £110m sales. Image
Even though #LFC spent £74m the prior season, mainly on Jota, Thiago & Tsimikas, their £110m gross spend in the last two years is still the lowest of the Big Six, far below #CFC £330m, #MCFC £260m, #AFC £226m. #MUFC £201m and #THFC £160m. Liverpool also had the lowest net spend. Image
Read 49 tweets
30 Aug
I have put together a graphical overview covering some key areas of football finance for some leading Italian clubs:
1. Profit & Loss
2. Revenue
3. Expenses
4. Balance Sheet
Each of the 4 pages includes 6 graphs showing the 10-year trends for #Juventus #Inter #Milan #ASRoma
Juventus graphical overview covering some key areas of football finance:
1. Profit & Loss
2. Revenue
3. Expenses
4. Balance Sheet
Each of the 4 pages includes 6 graphs showing the 10-year trend for #Juventus
Inter graphical overview covering some key areas of football finance:
1. Profit & Loss
2. Revenue
3. Expenses
4. Balance Sheet
Each of the 4 pages includes 6 graphs showing the 10-year trend for #Inter
Read 6 tweets
26 Aug
Given the importance of wage bills to the likely success of football clubs, I thought that it would be interesting to look at wages for the Big 5 European leagues in the 2019/20 season (the most recently published accounts). Some thoughts in the following thread.
As a technical note, I have converted wages from Euro denominated leagues to GBP using the 1.14 exchange rate from the Deloitte Money League. To facilitate comparison, I have provided figures for each league in both Euros and GBP, though the overviews are only in GBP.
In England the highest wage bill in 2019/20 was #MCFC £351m, followed by #LFC £326m, #MUFC £284m, #CFC £283m, #AFC £225m and #THFC £181m. It is worth noting that some clubs’ figures were inflated by changing their year-end date, which meant the accounts covered 13 months.
Read 19 tweets
19 Aug
I have put together a graphical overview covering some key areas of football finance:

1. Profit & Loss
2. Revenue
3. Expenses
4. Balance Sheet

Each of the 4 pages includes 6 graphs showing 10-year trend for a club, starting with the “Big Six” #AFC #CFC #LFC #MCFC #MUFC #THFC
Arsenal graphical overview covering some key areas of football finance:

1. Profit & Loss
2. Revenue
3. Expenses
4. Balance Sheet

Each of the 4 pages includes 6 graphs showing the 10-year trend for #AFC
Chelsea graphical overview covering some key areas of football finance:

1. Profit & Loss
2. Revenue
3. Expenses
4. Balance Sheet

Each of the 4 pages includes 6 graphs showing the 10-year trend for #CFC
Read 8 tweets
16 Aug
Paris Saint-Germain’s signing of Lionel #Messi from #FCBarcelona has come as a major surprise to the footballing world. This thread will look at the financial implications and explain how #PSG are likely to still be able to meet UEFA’s Financial Fair Play (FFP) targets.
Despite a €99m (15%) fall in revenue in 2020, partly due to the COVID pandemic, #PSG wage bill still rose €43m (12%) to €414m, the club’s highest ever. This was more than 3 times as much as the closest challenger in France, Lyon with €132m, representing 29% of Ligue 1 wages.
#PSG €414m wage bill is the second highest in Europe, only surpassed by #FCBarcelona €443m (before their La Liga salary cap challenges), but more than clubs like #MCFC €401m, #RealMadrid €378m, #LFC €371m, #FCBayern €340m, #MUFC €324m and #CFC €323m.
Read 50 tweets
9 Aug
Newcastle United’s 2019/20 financial results cover a season when they finished 13th in the Premier League for the second year in a row. Disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Some thoughts in the following thread #NUFC
#NUFC swung from £41m pre-tax profit to £26m loss, as revenue fell £23.8m (14%) from £176.4m to £152.6m, partly due to COVID, while expenses increased £45m (28%), including an additional month of accounts. Profit on player sales was up £2m to £26m. Loss after tax was £23m. Image
Main driver of #NUFC revenue reduction was broadcasting, which fell £18m (14%) from £124m to £106m, while match day dropped £7.4m (30%) from £24.8m to £17.4m. However, commercial rose £1.4m (5%) from £27.7m to £29.1m, including £1.2m from government job retention scheme. Image
Read 52 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(