1-2 Unfortunately, the question, which is the headline, is one thing, and the content is something else. But since I have done a lot of research on this and I taught the materials for years, I can see the source of confusion. #OOTT#Oil
2- In economics, everything is determined at the margin, therefore, shares and percentages are less relevant, if any. The impact of increasing oil prices depends on the reactions of the governments and central banks. See my pinned thread
3- Oil prices increased drastically between 2004 and 2008… all major economies, including China and India, enjoyed healthy economic growth… Why record oil prices had no impact then? Is conventional wisdom wrong?
4- the idea that every recession was preceded by high oil prices is correct… but get this: every recession was preceded by decline in government spending, higher interest rates, higher taxes, or a combination of them. Theory supports the latter
5- It does not matter whether share of oil in the economy is 15% or 5%. The impact of higher oil prices could be as severe with 5% if the govt & the Fed’s policies are wrong. 15% vs 5% is a matter of energy & national security, but not whether economy can withstand high prices
7- taking oil on its own in the current circumstances is wrong. This is a rare moment in history where prices of all energy sources increased significantly & where some are substitutes for others. Impact of higher ENERGY prices is different from the impact of higher oil prices
8- the impact of higher ENERGY prices on the economy is severe. Government and Fed policies can make it worse or mitigate the impact, but the impact is there simply because of the price effect, the income effect, and the substitution effect.
9- Government policies cannot compensate for all these negative effects at this time. Oil prices are already high. Going to $100 or higher under current circumstances will wreak havoc on the world economy. So, no, global economy cannot handle $100 oil
10- Although this article is old, it has all the major ideas needed to discuss the impact of high oil prices on economic growth
1- For a policy or a plan to succeed, the focus must be on what is under control, not on things that are controlled by others or cannot be controlled. #OOTT 2- Even non-competitive models in economics focus on quantity, not on prices.
3- Historically, OPEC tried to control quantities & prices at once. It failed miserably.
4- One of the reasons for the success of OPEC+ in recent years is the focus on what they control only & that was production. #Oil
5- #Texas Railroad Commission focused on quantities only when it rationed production. It succeeded according to many researchers.
6- The complete failure happened when the Texas Railroad Commission stopped controlling production and the US government imposed PRICE controls
Thread on the global energy crisis 1- Investors do not invest for "wartime"!
That is why you end up with shortages during wars, especially when supplies and materials are diverted to the army.
3- Add #COVID19, supply chain issues, policy failures, domestic & international politics, violations of all energy security principles, and low investment in recent years because of low energy prices and hype of US shale, renewables, and #ElectricVehicles ..you get energy crises
Thread on higher energy prices in Europe 1- Several people are saying that higher fossil fuel prices in Europe will expedite the transition to renewables. Really? We have been there before!
2- The basic materials used in all energy sources are the same. Costs go up for all.
3- If demand for drilling equipment increases as oil & gas prices rise, basic materials for wind & solar may not be available. If available, they will be at higher prices. With oil above $75 & natural gas above $5, the oil industry can afford the increase in cost. Others cannot!
4- Oil & renewable energy are not substitutes in Europe, the US, China, and India. That where most of the global oil consumption is. 5- Natural gas is needed to back up solar & wind regardless of its price in a carbon neutrality world. Otherwise, coal is here to stay as a backup.
سلسلة تغريدات عن أهمية أفغانستان الاستراتيجية لسياسات التغير المناخي 1- لانعرف بالضبط ماهو دور أنابيب الغاز والنفط والثروات المعدنية لأفغانستان في الاحتلال الأميركي لها، أو الانسحاب منها، أو في السماح لطالبان في السيطرة عليها. #أفغانستان#طالبان
2- الحديث عن دور هذه الأنابيب والمعادن هو مجرد تخمين، أو هو مجرد منفعة إضافية، وهذا يعني أنها لم تكن الهدف الأساس لا في الدخول ولافي الخروج، ولكن لامانع من تحقيق منافع اضافية. وجود تصريحات أميركية عن أهميتها لايعني بالضرورة على أنها السبب.
3- خط أنبوب "تابي" ينقل الغاز من تركمانستان إلى أفغانستان ثم إلى الباكستان والهند بطول 1814 كم. الفكرة قديمة منذ التسعينيات، تم إنشاء أقسام منه في أفغانستان وفي باكستان. الخط مهم للغرب لأنه يضارب على إيران. مهم للباكستان والهند، ويخفف من اعتماد الصين على روسيا.
Thread on the Infrastructure Bill & Biden's asking OPEC to increase production 1- It is possible that the statement regarding OPEC is a routine one, which previous administrations had repeated multiple times. 2- But the timing makes us link it to the infrastructure bill. #OOTT
2- Economically, the infrastructure bill is inflationary. It increases the demand for almost everything, including petroleum products. Hence, it is logical to expect prices of these products to increase.
With inflation, the money dedicated to infrastructure will get less done!
3- Politically, the last thing the Biden Administration wants is to give Republicans a platform to attack the infrastructure bill by focusing on inflation, and fuel prices in particular. Therefore, the objective is to fight inflation on all levels, including higher fuel prices