It's good to be back! Follow this thread for the video stream & live coverage of tonight's first SFI Community Lecture at @TheLensic in two years, featuring @Sara_Imari on the #physics of living #systems.
And stay tuned for an extraordinary lineup of additional talks this year...
"I want to start with the first question [of these three], which is, 'How will we learn whether there are others 'like us'?"
- @Sara_Imari, who launches into her talk tonight by asking the crowd how many of us think we've made #FirstContact with #Aliens...
"It's not necessarily a new phenomenon that we have been thinking about #Alien life, but we also have to ask ourselves what we're *projecting* about the current cultural moment on #AncientCivilizations."
- @Sara_Imari
"If you poll the general public, a random person is unlikely to know there was a possible sign of life on #Venus reported last year on the cover of the @NYTimes. Looking for a gas that life on Earth produces is not a sufficient explanatory framework for looking for life like us."
"The way we talk about #aliens right now is early, in its mythological phase of development. Aliens are modern #mythology."
- @Sara_Imari cites #BillMoyers & #JosephCampbell in exploring the basis of our thought about The Other & our place in the universe:
Ptolemaic epicycles were predictive, but not explanatory. "What was actually required to understand #planetary motion? That took the convergence of human thought across centuries and hundreds of miles."
From Tycho Brahe to Isaac Newton to Albert Einstein, @Sara_Imari on how #science develops fundamental understanding and on the #unification of governing principles by (not-ever-isolated) intellects across space and time.
(In this process, #astrobiology is still VERY young...)
On @LIGO: "It took a hundred years to get here, millions of dollars, hundreds of brilliant people...to get to 'First Contact' of humanity with the phenomenon of gravitational waves." - @Sara_Imari
Theory precedes empirical confirmation.
"We don't know what we are as beings in the universe, so we don't know what #aliens are going to be like."
Perhaps the #GreatFilter solution to the #FermiParadox is actually a "Great *Perceptual* Filter" — an #epistemic shortcoming, not a lack of aliens to be discovered.
"I'm a mom of two but when I have the luxury of asking #DeepQuestions, this is my favorite, asked by Erwin #Schrödinger: 'What is Life?' He asked if we can explain life with the properties of physics & chemistry. His answer was, 'We can't.'"
- @Sara_Imari
"It's fine to say there's no *conflict* between life and the laws of #physics. But my point is, it's not *explained* by them either."
"When we think about the history of physics, these grand fundamental theories, we've gone through several unifications over the history of the progression of this body of knowledge."
- @Sara_Imari
Coming soon: the unification of info/computation & matter (speaking speculatively)
.@Sara_Imari maps the past and future of unifications in #physics, pointing toward laws of information and the possible (including both general/universal constraints true at any time as well as the limits at a given moment, what Stuart Kauffman called "The #AdjacentPossible"):
"There's been this long and sordid relationship between #physics and #mathematics. We don't know which is more fundamental. Do we just embody abstractions? Why do the laws of mathematics correspond to the physical world?"
- @Sara_Imari on #MaxTegmark & #NeoPlatonism
"Why do some things & not others exist? This is a question that #physics is not prepared to address. I think the closest we get is with #Darwin's Theory of #NaturalSelection. Some things exist on our planet but not all; we don't have all possible forms of organism."
"I have been accused of #scientism, which people say is
an over-belief in #science — but I think it's not that; it's actually an over-belief in the power of our current scientific #explanations."
"I think #mathematics and #technology are far too abstract. People think math was discovered; I think it was invented by human minds. ... If we want to think about the physics of the #possibility space, I think we need to turn to #molecules."
"If you want to solve the origin of life, it's like a #search problem. ... The interesting thing is that chemical space is absolutely huge. Some of the #chemicals produced by our #technology, you have to know what you're doing to create them, and now we rely on AI."
- @Sara_Imari
"If you want a theory that can explain both the origin of life & help in the search for #alien life, you need a theory of #chemistry, & chemistry is the first place where we see this combinatorial explosion."
- @Sara_Imari
"The way we talk about things in #AssemblyTheory is that everything you observe is a coordinate in 'Assembly Space.' So I'm not '@Sara_Imari' ... Every observed structure has a particular assembly pathway telling you about that thing as a process in time."
"What we're saying with #AssemblyTheory is that there are causal #constraints based on what has come before...the length of #time limits what can come next. It helps us explain not just what exists, but what can [in terms of] the causal #history."
"Theories are important, but so is the pace of technology with respect to those theories. What are we doing know that will allow us to see alien life? ... What we're doing now is outsourcing how we *think* to technology."
- @Sara_Imari on #AI & #Astrobiology
"We built a #BigBang simulator to see the origin of the cosmos; we need to build a Planet Simulator is see the origins of life, and 'grow alien life' here on Earth. The crucial data cannot be obtained until we have a theory that tells us what to look for."
ICYMI, this week's SFI Seminar by Fractal Faculty Stuart Firestein (@Columbia) on "what started out ass a very simple-seeming problem [re: #olfaction] and turned out to be very complicated":
"Everything we know about the world comes through these little holes in our head and the skin covering our body, processed through tissue specialized to interpret it."
"The thing to notice about [sight and hearing] is that they're [processing] fairly low-dimensional stimuli."
"Even a simple smell is composed of a VARIETY of molecules, and these are high-dimensional from a chemical point of view. And it's also a somewhat discontinuous stimulus. How do we get from this bunch of molecules to this unitary perception of something like a rose?"
"A key feature of this is talk is that we make sense of what each other are saying IN PART by what they say, but ALSO by what we expect of them."
"Language transmits info against a background of expectations – syntactic, semantic, and this larger cultural spectrum. It's not just the choices of make but [how] we set ourselves up to make later choices."
"I think what really drives [the popularity of the #multiverse in #scifi] is regret... There's a line in @allatoncemovie where #MichelleYeoh is told she's the worst version of herself."
"I don't think we should resist melting brains. I think we should just bite the bullet."
"When you measure the spin of an electron, or the position...what happened to all of the other things you could have seen? Everett's idea is that they're all real. They all become real in that measurement."
- SFI Fractal Faculty @seanmcarroll at @guardian theguardian.com/science/audio/…
"At the level of the equations there is zero ambiguity, but the metaphors break down. The two universes it splits into aren't as big as the original universe. The thickness of the two new universes adds up to the thickness of the original universe."
"One way to represent the kind of #compositionality we want to do is with this kind of breakdown...eventually a kind of representation of a sentence. On the other hand, vector space models of #meaning or set-theoretical models put into a space have been very successful..."
"Humans are prone to giving machines ambiguous or mistaken instructions, and we want them to do what we mean, not what we say. To solve this problem we must find ways to align AI with human preferences, goals & values."
- @MelMitchell1 at @QuantaMagazine: quantamagazine.org/what-does-it-m…
“All that is needed to assure catastrophe is a highly competent machine combined with humans who have an imperfect ability to specify human preferences completely and correctly.”
"It’s a familiar trope in #ScienceFiction — humanity threatened by out-of-control machines who have misinterpreted human desires. Now a not-insubstantial segment of the #AI research community is concerned about this kind of scenario playing out in real life."
- @MelMitchell1