"We build the geometry directly by thinking about the PATH that our 3D printer takes. There's no intermediate slicing software [to render CAD as "2D" layers]."
"You can start to think about surface textures - like spikes that you can't do with a traditional slicer. Or...here's a path that's a sine wave, but every other layer is rotated. Or...one creature is following THIS path, and the other is chasing it around."
"In software, you control a lot of parameters sent to the machine. Each machine has certain physical constraints. And then finally, on the materials side there are A TON of variables. All of these things are interconnected."
More examples of, and open-source code for, 3D printing with clay:
"It took a tremendous amount of experimenting and play to get to the point where we could even EXTRUDE @PlayDoh..."
@leahbuechley on the interaction of software, hardware, and materials in #3Dprinting — and "what it means for a material to even be printable."
What about #3DPrinting a #GlutenFree, corn-based homemade #PlayDough? Well: more stable under 1.4 cm, but "then there's a #PhaseTransition...your nozzle is so far above the printing surface, the material folds." It also dries out faster. Corn PLUS Wheat wins. @leahbuechley (@UNM)
"The #stability of the print increases as we add #clay to the mixture. We're not only interested in vertical stability, but also horizontal...with play-dough you can't really print anything BUT a cylinder. For softer materials, they start to slump..."
- @leahbuechley (@UNM)
"Gluten-free doughs shrink a lot more than the wheat-based doughs."
"Play-dough forms shrink less as you add more clay to the mixture."
Combining #materials for different heat-sensitive behaviors in #3Dprinted ceramics:
"We think there are really interesting material possibilities to explore here...we can build something with one geometry and have it change."
- @leahbuechley (@UNM)
"We're interested in printing with more than one extrude head at a time...that will allow us to use multiple materials. And we're interested in modeling some of these material properties in the software..."
We start with a talk by SFI President David Krakauer:
"Would anyone care to guess why we're so GOOD at building transistors and so CRAP at designing drugs?"
"This thing [points to transistor] lives in a centralized system. This thing [points to cancer drug] lives in US."
"I'm going to pick on economics, because we like to do that at SFI. 'Ooh, look at that cover! So techy. Global, heat maps...' But here's 'Networks' [in the textbook]. THAT'S IT. Here's '#ComplexityEconomics.' NOTHING."
🧵 In today's SFI Seminar, Visiting Scholar @cgershen presents the second in his series of talks on core concepts in #ComplexSystems science, streaming now:
"In high school #physics class you are taught that with the initial conditions of a system, you can predict its future states. In #complexity, this is not so...it means #reductionism is not appropriate, #Platonism is not appropriate..."
- @cgershen
"You can see a layer of circuits computing something. What is it computing? Itself. In a 248x248 array, you can program the #GameOfLife inside the game of life. Computers allow us to explore #Complexity, and it's no surprise complexity became a science in the 1980s."
- @cgershen
Cormac McCarthy spent the last quarter century writing his novels at SFI. In this documentary from December 2017, Cormac in conversation with SFI President David Krakauer, reflects on isolation, mathematics, character, and the nature of the unconscious:
In anticipation of Cormac McCarthy’s newest books, “The Passenger” and “Stella Maris” (@AAKnopf, 2022), former SFI Miller Scholar @deepsurvivalsm0 recollects McCarthy’s long and ongoing friendship with SFI:
"Until recently the writer could be heard at SFI, clattering away on his portable typewriter from behind his office door. An affable member of this community, he would regularly emerge for afternoon tea or attend talks by SFI scholars."
🚀 We are live! Here is the correct streaming link for all of today's discussions and performances, starting with a panel on complex time with David Krakauer, James Gleick, Ted Chiang, and David Wolpert in a few moments (measured linearly...):
"One of the ideas we had with #InterPlanetary was, 'What would it take to make science hedonistic? And instead of telling people to do it, you'd have to tell people to STOP doing it?"
- SFI President David Krakauer sets the tone for this weekend's celebrations #IPFest
David Krakauer: "Do you have a favorite model or metaphor for #time?"
@JamesGleick: "You've already mentioned a river; that's everybody's favorite. Borges said time is a tiger. People talk about it as a thread. We ONLY talk about time in metaphors."
In 2009 @TIME named @NAChristakis of @Yale, one of our panelists tonight, one of the top 100 most influential people in the world. His clever experiments examine the spread of altruism, emotions, & health behaviors in both virtual & real-world settings.
Our next panelist, SFI Ext Prof @JacksonmMatt of @Stanford, is a highly-awarded economist & the author of The Human Network: How Your Social Position Determines Your Power, Beliefs, & Behaviors: web.stanford.edu/~jacksonm/book…