Thread by @TheLastRefuge2

1. FTA: "Congressional investigators are still trying to determine what the “CF article” reference means and who the agents thought they were trying to throw “under the bus.”

thehill.com/homenews/house…

2. The answer is within this WaPo article: washingtonpost.com/world/national… This is the article Lisa Page and Peter Strzok were discussing.

3. The "CF" was Clinton Foundation.
The person "thrown under the bus" was James Comey.
Lisa Page says: [.."“Makes me feel WAY less bad about throwing him under the bus to the forthcoming CF article,”"...]

4. Lisa Page stating: ..."Makes me feel WAY less bad about throwing him under the bus to the forthcoming CF article."... Indicates that DOJ/FBI lawyer Lisa Page was one of the sources for the Washington Post article.

5. So now we know that FBI Attorney, and legal aide to Andrew "Andy" McCabe, Lisa Page was also a leaker.

6. Which makes sense for a few reasons. #1) Because the Washington Post is the primary outlet for IC leaks. The New York Times is their secondary outlet.

7. Also #2) Because Lisa Page was an active participant, and openly partisan ideologue, inside the DOJ/FBI investigative unit working to protect Hillary Clinton.

8. and #3) Because the substantive issue within the story at the time was anger by the Clinton Camp, against Comey, for announcing the re-opening of the Clinton email investigation.

9. What that individual series of text messages from Lisa Page highlights is how far she was willing to go to shape DOJ/FBI investigative action to the benefit of her favorite political candidate.

10. Lisa Page and Peter Strzok were not only willing to manipulate their official investigative duty to the benefit of Hillary Clinton, but they were also willing to leak information to the media in an effort to shape the narrative around their investigative duties.

11. Both Page and Strzok are scheduled to testify to the House Intelligence Committee *VERY* soon. Like, within a matter of days.

12. Given the revelation(s) within the text messaging today, and the evidence therein that proves the politicization of their offices, it is highly likely *NOW* they will plead the fifth and refuse to answer questions.

13. Which immediately makes me wonder about the motive behind whomever gave that text messaging information to John Solomon and @SaraCarterDC . thehill.com/homenews/house…

14. Were those specific text messages, which clearly prove Lisa Page was leaking to the media, INTENTIONALLY given to Solomon and @SaraCarterDC because someone on "The Hill" was trying to warn Page about known evidence against her?

15. I don't expect that @SaraCarterDC would reveal her sourcing on this. However, I would WARN HER, *strongly* that there's a serious possibility she is being used by her SOURCE to dilute damage against the "small group" co-conspirators.

16. Those who have followed CTH closely will note my historic suspicions toward a strong likelihood that @seanhannity 's favorite journalists are being handled by DC control agents who know how manipulate media people.

17. The alternative possibility, willing participation, is more troubling... I'll need further information before discussing that.

THE END