One person's "discrediting" is another's "peer reviewing". Which is it? Well, that depends on the quality of the review and whether it's aim is h ps://t.co/Zs5vpnzDet
That sentence just doesn't compute, as it's very possible to be succesful in one thing while failing to understand others, as scnbc.com/2017/05/06/war…uXeqWQLL0D
The key is to look for deflections (on both sides).
Is your question being answered or not?
Is your comment being addressed?
Draw it as a path from A to B, A being the question and B being the answer.
Then add other points as new comments or topics are being introduced.
Then kindly ask your driver to take you to B, which is where you want to go.
Get out while saying you are not being given what was promised: a drive to B.
Often, these will want to take you to their homes, located in the Valley of Irrelevance or the Tower of Fandom.
They might be nice places, but they are not where you wanted to go.
But the discussion around it is atrocious.
When there are no relevant answers to comments, there is no content, and as such nothing to discuss anymore.
That's a pity.