I know I really should just ignore this, but I just have to rant about what a dumb dumb counterproductive dumb discussion this is...
Careful analysis shows that differences in innate cognitive skill can account for maybe 1/6 of state-to-state variations in GDP: noahpinionblog.blogspot.jp/2015/06/iq-and…
That's not much.
1. Turn your country into a nightmarish totalitarian state that breeds humans like animals,
2. Invent some kind of gene therapy, or
3. Large-scale immigration of super-smart people.
Is it worth enduring decades or centuries of horror to raise the genetic component of IQ by a couple points?
If you answered "yes", please self-deport to North Korea.
That leaves very-large-scale high-skilled immigration.
That's good, right? Skilled immigration is something we should want anyway, so why not?
Well...
Righties: "High IQ is awesome!"
Me: "You want geniuses? Operator, patch me through to India, China, Nigeria, Indonesia, Ghana..."
Righties: "WAIT, NO"
Me: "Ahh I see, you just wanted -"
Righties: "LOOK OVER THERE, A CAMPUS PROTESTER!"
Why would you even bring race into an IQ discussion in the first place? It's usually just an excuse for bigotry.
The first of these is EDUCATION.
All our research shows that education improves IQ by a huge amount! psyarxiv.com/kymhp
Check this out:
It seems likely that lots of other toxins that we haven't studied are lowering our IQ too.
ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP should be one of our top IQ-raising initiatives!!
bloomberg.com/view/articles/…
A) usually just a cover for bigotry,
B) not an important issue, and
C) a distraction from really important and useful stuff like education and the environment.
Brah, just because society doesn't accept you doesn't make you Galileo.
They get funded. They get published.
If there's anything there to find, they will find it.
Leave the important stuff to the professionals, eh?
(end)