Here for example rt.com/news/424149-sk…
What about the BZ- like isn't that important?
a) Novichok was used- confirmed by OPCW labs
b) RU claiming BZ was also detected in samples by Spiez
c) RU claiming Novichok presence of secondary importance to alleged BZ presence
d) RU trying to bring into question OPCW lab findings and/or reporting
a) It was not likely to have been Novichok
b) If it was it could not have been detected by OPCW labs
c) BZ also found
d) Others made the stuff found, or it was 'planted'
See above on all points
Note RU have OPCW findings
1) No BZ found ( as reported to all states already)
2) Only BZ precursor referered to in technical reports ( use as part of testing)
3) Not even reference to BZ in report