Profile picture
John Stoehr @johnastoehr
, 21 tweets, 4 min read Read on Twitter
1. Today, let’s discuss voting. Or not voting. The occasion is Monday’s ruling by the US Supreme Court. In a 5-4 decision, the five conservative justices said employers can bar employees from class-action litigation by forcing them into individual arbitration.
2. In plain English, workers can win in court, will likely lose in arbitration. (No juries in arbitration, mostly people sympathetic to employers.) The majority ruled in favor corporate power. The 1 percent won.
3. Justice Neil Gorsuch, writing for the conservative majority, said: “The policy may be debatable but the law is clear: Congress has instructed that arbitration agreements like those before us must be enforced as written.”
4. Writing for the four liberals, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg called the ruling “egregiously wrong,” adding that: "The inevitable result of today’s decision will be the under-enforcement of federal and state statutes designed to advance the well-being of vulnerable workers.”
5. OK, what does this have to do with voting? Elections have consequences is the point. If you voted for Trump, and Monday’s ruling affects you, perhaps you will be more careful about your vote next time.
6. If Monday’s ruling is as bad for the working class as liberals say it is, liberals need to look every member of the Trump-supporting working class square in the eye and say: you wanted this, now you got it. If you don’t, vote Democratic next time.
7. Voters should be held responsible, just as leaders are. Too often, voters are treated as if the “costumer is always right” and when the costumer fails, it’s someone else’s fault. It’s just not so.
8. Voters must understand there is a price to be paid for political decision-making, that this isn’t a game, this isn’t entertainment, and that high court rulings that knee-cap labor rights are no exception to the price we all pay.
9. Liberals, too, should soul search. If everyone who could vote did vote in the 2016 election, we might not be talking about Gorsuch writing pedantically about contract law, but instead Garland (Obama’s nominee) who would have almost certainly favored the rights of labor.
10. If you did not vote in 2016, and if Monday’s ruling affects you, well, maybe you’ll vote next time.
11. The immediate retort? Don’t blame voters. Some didn’t vote for Trump, liberals say. In fact, three million more voted for Hillary Clinton.
12. Furthermore, liberals say, we didn’t suppress black voters in Michigan, Wisconsin and Florida. We didn’t hack the computers of the DNC. We didn’t coordinate with foreigners. We didn’t do any of these things, but we have to live with this SCOTUS ruling anyway. All true.
13. But none of the above is sufficient to countering the point that if everyone who could vote did vote in 2016, the Supreme Court would have favored rights, not power. 58% of eligible voters voted in 2016. That’s barely more than a majority.
14. You get the justices you voted for, or didn’t vote for. This is the price we pay.
15. For another thing, Gorsuch is not a product of the 2016 election. He is the product of the 2014 midterms when none of the above factors—Russia, voter ID laws, etc.—were factors.
16. Game-changing fact: 36 percent of eligible voters went to the polls on Election Day 2014, the day when the Democrats lost control of the Senate, the day Mitch McConnell seized the power to block a vote on Judge Garland, a power he exercised mere hours after Scalia died.
17. To put a finer point on it, 2014 saw the lowest level of voter turnout in seven decades. An even finer point: support in the electorate for the agenda of the first African-American president fell to historic depths—and this fact cuts across race, class, gender, everything.
18. Only 2010 was worse. Before that, everyone had the excuse of fighting in a global war for not voting in the midterms of 1942. What’s our excuse?
19. The only plausible excuse is that we generally do not trust government enough to participate in it, or we don’t believe voting will make a difference. There are other factors, too, what political scientists call “the cost of voting,” such as voter registration and frequency.
20. But while these might explain low voter turnout, they do not justify it, because there is no justifying inaction in a democracy. The buck stops with voters, like it or not. We made some bad choices. Now we—the 99 percent—are going to pay the price.
21. This thread might be hard to hear, but I'm here to tell you hard things. So ... if you're still with me, thanks for staying! And, if you wish, please sign up for my newsletter! stoehr.substack.com/p/dont-blame-g…
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to John Stoehr
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member and get exclusive features!

Premium member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year)

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!