By presenting the results of this stretching-the-truth survey to people as science-y (or at least not admitting it was unsound), they were able to argue their case for months and months as if it was preordained.
They primed their audiences with fake statistics.
I guarantee that they rushed it to get done in time for the MLS BoG meeting in December 2016.
Guarantee it shows they rushed it.
How statistically significant was it?
Let's see what @MichaelArace1 thought about it at the time. dispatch.com/content/storie…
"Some of the questions feel loaded"
"If Precourt wants to move the team-there are a dozen cities clamoring for MLS franchises, including at least 2 municipalities represented by BSG-then he is out of here. Either way, the survey has his back."
1 of the age groups is "over 65".
The person responds, "That's me, I'm over 65".
And then you end the survey.
Does that sound like a legit survey?
'My friend wants to know because early in the survey, the questioner asked his age. When he indicated that he was "over 65," the survey ended.'
"My biggest concern is that if the survey company is not interested in getting input from people 65 or over, it is trying to influence the results. "
"My pleasure! I totally understand your concern and I have forwarded the info to the MPT in case the survey is ever presented to the Council."