The wonderful conversation I just had with Jake Sullivan on The Good Fight is one many reasons I don’t quite buy this.
Let me explain.
1/n slate.com/articles/podca…
And yet, he’s in favor of a very robust economic policy program.
2/n
* A (kind of) jobs guarantee
* Much higher taxes on concentrated wealth
* Universal Medicare
* Dept-free lifelong learning
* Tough measures against monopolists
* and much, much more.
3/n
Seriously, listen to our conversation.
4/n
slate.com/articles/podca…
5/n
nytimes.com/2018/07/21/us/…
* The utility of angry language
* Whether ot use radical language in more moderate districts
6/n
* Candidate quality matters more than candidate rhetoric; and
* Candidate rhetoric matters more than candidate ideology
7/n
If you're not in the persuasion game, you won't move the needle.
8/n
And the thing we should particularly watch is the relative performance of candidates employing different rhetorical strategies in swing states and districts.
9/n
Because political scientists have seen, again and again, that the opposition only beats authoritarian populists when it is able to hold together an ideologically diverse coalition.
10/n
Please do! He's thoughtful and far-ranging and even, yes, inspirational. In short, this is exactly the kind of conversation I was hoping to have when I got into podcasting.
11/11
megaphone.link/SLT7487183982