![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DjGbNG1W4AEzw6a.jpg)
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DjGkFrOWsAEk6zO.jpg)
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DjGqGtLXoAAxWO5.jpg)
- The original front page
- Following my complaint, @IpsoNews's decision that the article was "seriously misleading" and contained "clearly serious errors"
- Today's front page with a reference to the ruling
- The ruling as published in today's @DailyMailUK
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DjGuIZOXgAABv14.jpg)
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DjGua_yWwAAjlg3.jpg)
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DjGucD9X4AAOdjv.jpg)
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DjGucrGXcAA8N7D.jpg)
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DjHiOugX0AECXgu.jpg)
See thread at
Ipso decided that this @DailyMailUK front page was seriously inaccurate and in breach of the Editor's Code. Also that, despite my complaint, the Daily Mail failed to appreciate just how serious the errors were.
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DjH7OPeXoAEuH6U.jpg)
pressgazette.co.uk/daily-mail-run…
theguardian.com/media/2018/jul…
writer actually lecturing others on "fake news". And wondering why there is so much fake news about.
*Sigh*
Hmm... yes, a complete mystery...
Why should an inaccurate front page not result in a front-page correction?
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DjTMDkNXgAAmwb0.jpg)
& special thanks to anyone who has not blocked/muted/unfollowed me, despite my dozens of tweets about one thing!
Millions of people will have seen the inaccurate, misleading front page. But, now we have a correction, we'd be lucky if even just a few thousand saw it.