It's amazing watching Bloomberg doubling down on its bad hardware hacking story. Instead of addressing the bad reporting pointed out in the original story, it continues with the bad reporting in new stories.
This is technical gibberish, telling techies nothing. Is it one MAC address or two? Or two IP addresses on one MAC address? Networking isn't so complex that you have to avoid sufficient details. 
Vagueness and confusion in such simple technical details is an indication the journalist or the source is fudging them.
It's like UFO conspiracy theories -- lots of fuzzy photographs, but no clear one. Same with Bloomberg: details are so easy to obtain, like a packet captured from the network, or a picture of the Ethernet connector, that we have to ask why no such detail exists?
