1. This is the 4th time @TheJusticeDept has admitted their official position is that no evidence supports collusion. It's also the 4th time we've been subjected to "breathless speculation" post-release by clapping seals in an intel-spun media.
2. I say "intel-spun media" B/C they're not quite state-run. They're just ignorant ideologues, many of whom don't even know they're spun. They're not sources, folks. You're an asset. Big difference. Hate to break it to you. Now you stupid, hanging on a hope it's true.
It's not.
It's not.
3. The "walls have been closing" in on Donald Trump for > 18 months. In the end, we have no evidence of collusion, and clapping seals are reduced to exaggerating the seriousness of process crimes and campaign finance violations no worse than those committed by Barack Obama.
4. In truth, Robert Mueller was always the "insurance policy" against your decision to elect Donald Trump. He always was. He's a cover up artist, not a man of integrity. He covers for corrupt agents and politicians, organized crime chieftains and wife-beating football players.
5. His new job is to to cover for what his friends had done to a presidential candidate, one they never expected to win, let alone to find out what they had done.
Ask yourselves something...
If they had the gaul to do this to Trump, do you really believe he's the only one?
Ask yourselves something...
If they had the gaul to do this to Trump, do you really believe he's the only one?
6. Highly unlikely, no?
Isn't it far more likely they abuse this power all the time? Why the hell wouldn't they? Who is going to stop them?
Maggie H. and Michael Isikoff?
This is the inevitable result of an unaccountable state with too much power. That used to be common sense.
Isn't it far more likely they abuse this power all the time? Why the hell wouldn't they? Who is going to stop them?
Maggie H. and Michael Isikoff?
This is the inevitable result of an unaccountable state with too much power. That used to be common sense.
7. And that leaves us with the ultimate question surrounding the Mueller coup, I mean investigation.
Does the state still believe it must respect your decision? Or, to put it another way, are you still the sovereign?
Or, are our elections and foundering documents just for show?
Does the state still believe it must respect your decision? Or, to put it another way, are you still the sovereign?
Or, are our elections and foundering documents just for show?
8. Lastly, to journalists, neither the sentencing guideline nor the indictment itself, are evidence. The former is the prosecutor's opinion/recommendation and the latter is their allegation. Again, not evidence.
Journalists apparently do not require evidence, anymore.
Journalists apparently do not require evidence, anymore.
