,
5 tweets,
2 min read
Read on Twitter
Replaying as quote to start new thread. Agree with Marcy’s reading of the regs, one I was not familiar with. Also agree that this reference is too cryptic (and likely too self interested) to be taken at face value. Wanted to flag this graf from something I wrote on this ...
2/ last night. 
3/ Again, when I wrote this I was aware of the reg Marcy references. But I think the logic still applies. RR has refused to subvert the probe. But he is still the President’s appointee, seeing a case where a story was this damaging and had at least some errors, he might be ...
4/ motivated to insert himself. Here’s the link to the piece. It’s sub req, but the passage I’m screengrabbed is the relevant one for these purposes. talkingpointsmemo.com/prime-beta/wha…
5/ I shld say I think Marcy’s read of the reg is plausible. But not my area of expertise so I’d be curious what others say, or more precedents, etc.
