,
6 tweets,
1 min read
Read on Twitter
In real terms, no (unless journos believe they add no substance to info coursing across networks).
People use this for news. If journos not here, they lose ability to represent their work, rely on others to do so. You can argue for operational standards--but same true for all /1
People use this for news. If journos not here, they lose ability to represent their work, rely on others to do so. You can argue for operational standards--but same true for all /1
The greatest value of Twitter for participants as opposed to observers is the network. I have made many, many valuable connections with professionals I rely on via this iteration of the idiot box.
Editing feed matters.
Blocking moronic trolls and mon instigators important /2
Editing feed matters.
Blocking moronic trolls and mon instigators important /2
But done correctly this puts info and discussion of peers in front of us in ways nothing else can -- and gives a window to the info space in other places we would otherwise not see in real time. /3
There is no social media replacement for Twitter yet. The lean, information focused bitstream.
Underlaid with major flaws in its model -- but it can be utilized as nothing else can for awareness. /4
Underlaid with major flaws in its model -- but it can be utilized as nothing else can for awareness. /4
Twitter is a powerful tool -- which is exactly why it is being exploited.
But it doesn't need to be that way.
And professionals who deal in the collection and dissemination of information not being here would be a mistake. /preach /6
But it doesn't need to be that way.
And professionals who deal in the collection and dissemination of information not being here would be a mistake. /preach /6
Obviously the above was *mob instigators.
