,
8 tweets,
5 min read
Read on Twitter
6/7/17 | Senate Intel hearing
Rubio: Are any of you aware of anyone in the WH/Exec. branch who was looking for advice from the intelligence community in order to influence an investigation?
Coats: No.
Rogers: No.
McCabe: No.
Rosenstein: No.
Timestamp: bit.ly/2StI6oo
Rubio: Are any of you aware of anyone in the WH/Exec. branch who was looking for advice from the intelligence community in order to influence an investigation?
Coats: No.
Rogers: No.
McCabe: No.
Rosenstein: No.
Timestamp: bit.ly/2StI6oo
Wyden: Have any of you four written memos, taken notes, or recorded yours or anyone else's interactions with POTUS related to the Russian investigation?
Coats: I don't take notes.
Rogers: No comment.
McCabe: No comment.
Rosenstein: No comment.
Timestamp: bit.ly/2T0gTiD
Coats: I don't take notes.
Rogers: No comment.
McCabe: No comment.
Rosenstein: No comment.
Timestamp: bit.ly/2T0gTiD
Heinrich: Did Comey ever share details w/you of his conversations w/POTUS, in particular, that POTUS asked for his loyalty?
McCabe: You can ask Comey tomorrow.
Heinrich: We will. And your unwillingness to share that conversation is an issue.
Timestamp: bit.ly/2BUwZQh
McCabe: You can ask Comey tomorrow.
Heinrich: We will. And your unwillingness to share that conversation is an issue.
Timestamp: bit.ly/2BUwZQh
Blunt: On May 11, 2017, you said there has been no effort to impede the Russia investigation. Is that still your position?
McCabe: There was talk about resources.
Blunt: But about impediment: is that still accurate?
McCabe: That's correct.
Timestamp: bit.ly/2EfuAzO
McCabe: There was talk about resources.
Blunt: But about impediment: is that still accurate?
McCabe: That's correct.
Timestamp: bit.ly/2EfuAzO
Lankford: Who first identified compliance issues w/702 About queries?
Rogers: NSA.
Lankford: What happened next?
Rogers: We ran a review of compliance w/702 [on 3/9/16], which finished on 10/20/16, but was still insufficient [until 3/30/17].
Timestamp: bit.ly/2T1teCZ
Rogers: NSA.
Lankford: What happened next?
Rogers: We ran a review of compliance w/702 [on 3/9/16], which finished on 10/20/16, but was still insufficient [until 3/30/17].
Timestamp: bit.ly/2T1teCZ
Cornyn: If someone uses the unmasking process for a political purpose, is that potentially a crime?
Rosenstein: Yes.
Cornyn: And to leak the name of an American citizen?
Rosenstein: Yes, and prosecutions have been brought and will be brought.
Timstamp: bit.ly/2SwL1wE
Rosenstein: Yes.
Cornyn: And to leak the name of an American citizen?
Rosenstein: Yes, and prosecutions have been brought and will be brought.
Timstamp: bit.ly/2SwL1wE
McCain: Admiral?
Rogers: Boy, some days I wish I was an ensign on the bridge of that destroyer again.
Rosenstein: I'm proud to be here with Director McCabe, and I'm sure he feels the same way.
McCabe: I do.
McCain: Whatever that might mean.
Timestamp: bit.ly/2TkkeYZ
Rogers: Boy, some days I wish I was an ensign on the bridge of that destroyer again.
Rosenstein: I'm proud to be here with Director McCabe, and I'm sure he feels the same way.
McCabe: I do.
McCain: Whatever that might mean.
Timestamp: bit.ly/2TkkeYZ
Wyden: Can the government use FISA Act Section 702 to collect communications it knows are entirely domestic?
Coats: Not to my knowledge. It would be against the law.
Timestamp: bit.ly/2H2RBsN
Coats: Not to my knowledge. It would be against the law.
Timestamp: bit.ly/2H2RBsN
