People are understandably angry at the PM over all this, but my ire is for MPs who would have ultimately voted for the PM's Deal but wanted to extract maximum concessions, political capital and BBC QT appearances out of only doing so on the 3rd or 4th try.
No Deal.
The PM's Deal.
Remain.
This was clear to everyone except the Op-Ed pages of the Times & Telegraph. Yet the UK had to endure months of pantomime panic as MPs tried to bloviate or bluster unicorns into existence.
Are we really supposed to believe 80+ MPs read the EU's letters of assurance and the advice from the AG saying it didn't address their core concern & thought, "Oh, that's alright then."
Please.
Why?
Because she believed (as many commentators did) that when things came down to the wire, MPs would vote for it.
Were MPs anticipating the deal would get better?
Surely not.
Even the ERG's stable of pub bores have ceased to pen "we've got em now" pieces.
It was tactical. It was performative. It was extractative.
It was, above all, resistance they never intended to maintain through to 'when it counts.'
Oops.
I'm offended by it.
/end
Thank you to all those who pointed it out.