Thread by @Staedtler

Aha. We have the amendments. Eight of them.

A (Baron) Unilateral exit from backstop

B (Baron) No deal exit in the absence of a withdrawal agreement

I'm already punting that Bercow refuses both of those because they're daft.

There are six sensible amendments

C: (Clarke) Customes union

D: (Boles) Common market 2.0

E: (Kyle) Confirmatory referendum

F: (Jones) Referendum before allowing no deal exit

G: (Cable) Parliamentary supremacy

H: (Eustice) EFTA / EEA

Of the six amendments, these three C, D and H don't deal with the withdrawal agreement.

G is mere political exhibitionism

So that leaves us E and F as the only plausible options, both of which ask for a confirmatory referendum, and the Kyle amendment with most credibility.

So I imagine that the Kyle amendment for a confirmatory referendum is the one that finally gets adopted by the end of the day.

The Brexiteers will probably quit before accepting that policy, and the government will collapse.

But I think the result will be that once parliament has made up its own mind, then it will be impossible for the government to get anything else through.

A referendum, a leadership election, a general election.

Let's go large and have all three.