Thread by @BusterUSMC

1. A Simplistic Step-By-Step Look Into
The Globsal Warming/Climate Change Scare
~Think of The Psychadelic Warlord (aka: Beto) As You Read The Following

Step1:
Powerful Advocacy Groups Claiming to Represent Both Science & the Public
In The Name of "Morality & Superior Wisdom."

Step 2:
Simplistic Depictions of the Underlying Science So As To Facilitate Widespread‘ Understanding.’‘Events’, Real or Contrived, Interpreted in Such a Manner As To Promote a 'Sense of Urgency' in the Public At Large.

Step 3:
Scientists "Flattered" by Public Attention & "Deferent" to ‘Political Will’ and Popular Assessment of Virtue

Step 4:
Significant Numbers of Scientists Eager to Produce "The Science" (Now Being Demanded by the ‘Public’ Because of The Never-Ending Push By Politicians & Their Obedient Media & Celebrities) CREATE Their Own "Junk" Science.

5. Given the automatic tendency of our educated elites to form advocacy groups, the above interactions would appear to have a certain inevitability, and the advantages of advocacy groups over individual scientists in communicating with the public ..

6. ..will inevitably give advocacy groups an opportunity to dominate the presentation of "the science."

This represents a fairly discouraging prognosis for the
interaction of science & politics.

7 Politicization causes decisions to come increasingly to depend on partisanship rather than science, and with theinevitable alternation of parties, there comes eventual de-emphasis of the underlying issue.

8. We can see this at the moment with respect to global warming.
Whether a better approach to the problem of the interaction of science and politics can be devised is not obvious, but it is certainly a question worth examining.

9. Lets Ask The Psychadelic Warlord or The New York Nutjob (AOC)
Where/Who (Scientist) Provided You Your"Facts"?
And What Citations Can Be Referenced?
(Bet You Hear a Pin Drop)

But Hey..We're All DOOMED In 12 Yrs
(Politicians-Prediction)
🤔What Will ANOTHER Tax Do?

Hint-🤑
END