Profile picture
Alison Greene
@GrassrootsSpeak
, 3 tweets, 1 min read Read on Twitter
"INTENT. Substantial evidence indicates that the President's attempts to remove the Special Counsel were linked to the Special Counsel's oversight of investigations that involved the Presidents conduct" - Pg 89 Volume 2 Mueller Report

Sure sounds like evidence of a crime to me🤔
"The evidence establishes the President's substantial involvement in the communications strategy related to information about his campaign's connections to Russia & his desire to minimize public disclosures about those connections."-Pg 106 Volume 2 Mueller Report

He had them lie
"Evidence does establish that the President connected the Flynn investigation to the FBIs broader Russia investigation & that he believed, as he told Christie, that terminating Flynn would end "the whole Russia thing""Pg 47 Volume 2 Mueller Report

Trying to end it is OBSTRUCTION
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Alison Greene
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @GrassrootsSpeak see all

Profile picture
Alison Greene
@GrassrootsSpeak
Dems must announce the START of Impeachment already😡
But it doesn’t mean just Vote & send it to Senate
They must lay it all out in THOROUGH HEARINGS
& demonstrate ALL HIGH CRIMES
Making Trumps Criminality indisputable
So its impossible for the majority of public & Senate to deny
REMEMBER
They didn’t have the votes to convict Nixon before Impeachment began
They didn’t even have the Nixon TAPES before Impeachment proceedings began
Nor did they have public opinion
It all comes as part of Impeachment proceedings
We make the case to REMOVE
But we must START
Use Impeachment proceedings to get Court Orders for people to testify
& for Documents to be released
You might even get the Court to demand Mueller testify PUBLICLY
Use Trumps secret formula-make it a TV show for the public
But we have one shot to do it right
EXPOSE THE COVER UP
Read 3 tweets
Profile picture
Alison Greene
@GrassrootsSpeak
This is a fascinating read & ties in w/ the Deutsche Bank Trump story. While it may not appear to be related to Trump it is. By uncovering a $230B mostly Russian Money Laundering scheme it shows the banks have been ignoring Russian Money Laundering for yrs cbsnews.com/news/how-the-d…
Deutsche Bank was accepting💰coming from Danske Bank which was coming from Russia through FAKE companies

A $230 BILLION Dollar Money Laundering scheme tying together Russian money AND Deutsche Bank then Trump going to Herculian Efforts to conceal his own dealings w/ Deutsche🤔
There are many scenarios where Trump can be implicated in this & if we’re blocked from investigating it we can’t uncover it. But let’s take a simple formula...
$230B illegal Russian💰goes to Danske Bank then goes to Deutsche Bank which then buys Real Estate-is some of it Trumps?
Read 8 tweets
Profile picture
Alison Greene
@GrassrootsSpeak
With the recent NY Times article about Deutsche Bank NOT flagging suspicious Trump & Kushner transactions remember
👉Trump waived Deutsche Banks punishment in 2017
👉Deutsche has been fined over $14.5B for Money Laundering, mostly for Russia, since 2011
🤔 ibtimes.com/political-capi…
And don’t forget
👉Deutsche loaned Trump over $2B over 2 decades. They even loaned to Trump AFTER suing him for defaulting on a $640M loan & Trump counter suing for $3B🤔
&
👉One of Trumps personal bankers was Justice Kennedy’s son & Kennedy’s early retirement brought Kavanaugh😳
And don’t forget
👉In 2017 there were multiple reports Mueller subpoenaed Deutsche for Trumps records
👉It was also reported Trump blew up at John Dowd after hearing Mueller subpoenaed Deutsche Bank. Jay Sekulow denied the subpoenas
👉Muellers report does NOT follow the money🤔
Read 5 tweets

Related threads

Profile picture
Senator Bob Casey
@SenBobCasey
“Some troubling-to-outright-damning episodes have been lost in the noise around its release.” nytimes.com/2019/06/07/opi…
Coordinating with WikiLeaks?
(VOLUME I, PP. 52-54)

“This section suggests that Mr. Trump may have been in the loop on the campaign’s efforts to get a heads-up about what WikiLeaks had planned. And that is a very long way from “no collusion.”
Looking for Clinton’s “missing” emails
(VOLUME I, PP. 49, 62-63)
“Collusion” has no legal definition. But if the term means working behind the scenes with Russian actors to obtain hacked information damaging to Mrs. Clinton...”
Read 8 tweets
Profile picture
Jerry
@OneDayAsALion_
1. "On Saturday, June 17, 2017, the President called McGahn and directed him to have the Special Counsel removed. McGahn was at home and the President was at Camp David." Page 85 vol 2 #TrumpsScaredOfMueller #TrumpObstructed
2."In interviews with this Office, McGahn recalled that the President called him at home twice and on both occasions directed him to call Rosenstein and say that Mueller had conflicts that precluded him from serving as Special Counsel." #TrumpsScaredOfMueller #TrumpObstructed
3."On the first call, McGahn recalled that the President said something like, "You gotta do this. You gotta call Rod." McGahn said he told the President that he would see what he could do." #TrumpObstructed #CaseNotClosed #Trump #TrumpsScaredOfMueller
Read 16 tweets
Profile picture
David Jolly
@DavidJollyFL
Allow me this Mueller Report exercise:

Between the GOP framing of 'exoneration' and the House suggesting the need for more investigation, it's worthwhile to demonstrate how a sufficient case can already be made for indictment & impeachment in the mere length of a Twitter thread.
First, as a predicate, Mueller asserts that "given the role of the Special Counsel as an attorney in the Department of Justice", he is bound by the OLC opinion that indictment of a sitting President would be in "violation of 'the constitutional separation of powers.'" (V2 P1)
Mueller further concedes, generously to the President, that it would be unfair to even offer a "prosecutor's judgment that crimes were committed" but then not charge Trump, because Trump would have no opportunity to "clear his name" "before an impartial adjudicator." (V2 P2)
Read 14 tweets
Profile picture
Mark Szuch
@MarkSzuch
Mueller Report Intro to Part II:
"First, a traditional prosecution or declination decision entails a binary determination to initiate or decline a prosecution, but we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment."
"Third, we considered whether to evaluate the conduct we investigated under the Justice Manual standards governing prosecution and declination decisions, but we determined not to apply an approach that could potentially result in a judgment that the President committed crimes."
"Fourth, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state."
Read 33 tweets
Profile picture
Laura Rozen
@lrozen
Interesting, Christie interview with Mueller office was just two months ago, Feb. 2019.
Trump tries to get McFarland to create witness statement he did not direct Flynn to talk to Kislyak. Also she is fired & offered ambassador
no pressure on Sessions not to recuse. this is all just on one day, march 2, 2016
Read 82 tweets
Profile picture
The Loyal Opposition 🇺🇸
@TheLoyalO
Contrary to Barr, Mueller actually concluded that Trump committed at least four acts of obstruction of justice.

A difficult element to prove in making out an obstruction case is "corrupt intent."

Here's what Mueller said about Trump's corrupt intent re: four episodes.

Thread
"SUBSTANTIAL evidence...
that the President's attempts to
remove the Special Counsel were
linked to the Special Counsel's
oversight of investigations that
involved POTUS's
conduct—and, most immediately, to
reports that the President was being
investigated for...obstruction."
"SUBSTANTIAL evidence indicates
that the President's efforts to have
Sessions limit the scope of the
Special Counsel's investigation to
future election interference was
intended to prevent further
investigative scrutiny of the
President's and his campaign's
conduct."
Read 7 tweets

Trending hashtags

#hotel #ReadTheMuellerReport #Mexico #Policy #Trump #cannabispolicy #IntelligenceCommunity #Brexit #Office #breakfast #Evidence #QuatreGatsTV3 #nextgeneration #Iran #vivajacky #FOIA #servicejournalism #collusion #HelsinkiSummit #firstlady #whitepapers #bugbounties #IIBAWC18 #INGSA_NA18 #president
Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!