“I think that the definition of Capitalism and how it’s different from Socialism that has been dominant for the last hundred years or so is out of date.”
(1/6)
In slaveries ... there were always private slaveries, and the [gov’t]-owned slaves, but nobody seriously [suggests] that it wasn’t slavery because the [gov’t] did it.”
(2/6)
Of course not.
Any of you [ever study] America during [WWII]? The [U.S. gov’t] suspended the market.
...
And the [gov’t] of the [U.S.] distributed ration cards....
No market.
So don’t tell me Capitalism requires markets...”
(3/6)
Not master-slave.
Not lord-serf.
Employer-employee.
...
It’s the same arrangement: a tiny group of people with the power and the control, and a vast majority of people who have to live under that control...”
(4/6)
It isn’t when workers have more income.
It isn’t when workers have more power.
It is when they are no longer ‘workers.’”
(5/6)
They’ve had a century to hone their arguments against Socialism by arguing against the government, and planning, and public enterprise.
They’re not prepared for a Socialism that says, ‘You’re full of it. You’re arguing the wrong issue.’”
(6/6)
How many of y’all would show up to a @LeftForum panel hosted by us next year?
😏😏😏