Profile picture
, 17 tweets, 5 min read Read on Twitter
Journey with me as I read Peter Shawn Taylor's latest light rail diatribe. #wrLRT Headline: it's too soon to cast ION as the hero
Somebody bitter Trump hasn't won a Nobel yet? Remember when former United States President Barack Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2009?<br />
<br />
That he'd only been president for a few months, and had done little of obvious (or lasting) value in achieving
The fact you're still using that tired "mall-to-mall" cliché means you do. To be fair, there's a genuine sense of excitement regarding our new mall-to-mall train service: a Christmas-morning vibe as everyone unwraps this new taxpayer-funded surprise. I have no wish to dampen anyone's fun in this regard.
Or you could, you know, talk to the developers themselves, who all are saying light rail is part of the reason they're building here. Rather, the Ion is properly considered a mind-bending device meant to convince developers to build condos and offices in formerly blighted downtown Kitchener. As evidence, train boosters repeatedly mention $3.1 billion in new development apparently spurred by the Ion's mere existence.
If anyone knows anything about lacking rigour, it's PST.

For instance, at least three of the largest projects downtown right now are starting from scratch, not old brick-and-beam. Such a claim lacks obvious rigour. Arguably of greater significance to the recent building boom is a burgeoning high tech sector's fixation with old, exposed beam factories — something our region has in spades — plus all the new talent streaming out of our two universities.
Sure, if you're going to compare us to Toronto or Vancouver. But we're well above average when you compare with other communities of our scale. Waterloo Region has one of the lowest public transit usage rates among major Canadian urban centres; almost 90 per cent of us drive to work. And Grand River Transit's current ridership of 21 million is still well below its 2013 peak.Waterloo's per capita ridership is 42.9, well above the median 30.9
PST conveniently omits the fact that Regional Council opted to underfund and spread the Regional Transportation Master Plan thin. They are carrying out the five year business plan over seven years. Meaning the 28 million target comes in 2023, not 2021. All of which makes the goal of 28 million bus and Ion riders by 2021 look rather heroic. It also suggests we might want to hold off on grandiloquent declarations of success until our public transit system proves whether it can meet its own targets.
Of course, no one else is arguing we shouldn't be evaluating light rail on its ridership. The thing is, we can't start doing that until we've actually started operating service.
Trust this Koch brothers-funded think tank to give us an objective perspective on transit. Feigenbaum is assistant director of transportation policy at the Reason Foundation in Washington, D.C., and a committee member of the Transportation Research Board. He counsels waiting at least a year or two before declaring any transit system a winner.
To be fair, there have been a lot of development-focused streetcar projects lately in the US that suck at providing good transit service. But our light rail system, operating along the busiest transit corridor with minimal traffic delay, does not fall into this category. And based on U.S. experience, Feigenbaum disputes the notion transit spending alone can trigger massive urban redevelopment.
Did Doug suggest this one?
Half of GRT's ridership is non-students, but they don't really count, do they? After all, they're people who take transit. It is certainly possible that Ion will revolutionize local commuting patterns. But having torn up our region to build a train that doesn't have to move people to be touted as an enormous success — and given the great reluctance of anyone other than students to ride the existing transit system − it seems equally likely that Ion's best days are already behind it.
$20 million a year to carry a third of the ridership of a $100 million a year transit system? Sounds like a good deal to me. Finally, keep in mind that Ion operator GrandLinq will be receiving payments from the region totalling $571 million (plus inflation) for 30 years to cover operating costs, maintenance and other continuing non-construction expenditures.
Rest assured, PST would not rush to call light rail a failure if there was early indication of trouble... Nope, can't say that with a straight face. We should judge the Ion on how well it performs as a public transit system over the long term. Anything else is pure hype and happenstance.
Have a little pity for Peter Shawn Taylor. He's forced to live in a city with light rail, something he's compared to having a disease. Light rail disease column in the Financial Post
Oh, and the 2017-202̶1̶23 business plan assumed a 2018 launch date for light rail, so...
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Mike Boos
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!