,
5 tweets,
2 min read
Read on Twitter
1. I detest redactions. I get caught in a divide by zero loop when I see them. I have to decipher them. It's like a disease. So here's one I've obsessed with. The easiest crime to prove for me was "receive solicit or accept" Russian help. 52 USC 30121(a)(2). Mueller sort of blew
2. it off. But, in fairness, he may have done the analysis & Comrade Barr is hiding it. But they made a small mistake in the redaction. The first part of Mueller's report did the June 9 Trump Tower meeting analysis but it also says there were two possible violations.
3. Trump Tower was one. but what was the other? A redaction mistake gives it away. Here is the index on the left and the body of text on the right. They didn't conceal well enough that it was Wikileaks. 
4. And because I have material that shows the Trump campaign was engaged in Twitter communications with an apparent Russian cutout about the Wikileaks dumps I'm pretty certain @FBIWFO has it too. So I'm pretty sure that redaction is about of Trump and his team were talking to
5. Assange through the Russian cutout. Ask Mueller about that. @RepJerryNadler @RepAdamSchiff @RepJeffries
