Now that's perfectly fair considering this matches the average annual interest rate.
So suffice to say he hasn't touched these savings within the past 1 year. (3/n)
He claims it came from his "savings" but we know he hasn't touched those.
And the donated amount is MORE than his annual salary even if we assume he donated his entire annual salary. (5/n)
Moreover, he didn't touch his savings so if claims that he donated his entire annual salary, how did he manage his expenses for a year? Because the "donated" amount exceeds his salary (6/n)
Or was it another pre-election "jumla"?
And if he still claims he did donate these 21 lakhs, what was the source of this extra income?
Sorry Modi ji, but it just does NOT add up. (7/n)