,
5 tweets,
2 min read
Read on Twitter
🚨NEWS: Attorneys for Michael Flynn accuse prosecutors of repeatedly failing to produce exculpatory evidence in contempt of court's order.
"Not only have the prosecutors thumbed their noses at this Court’s Order, they have ignored the rules of ethical conduct for the D.C. Bar."
"Not only have the prosecutors thumbed their noses at this Court’s Order, they have ignored the rules of ethical conduct for the D.C. Bar."
Prosecutors in Flynn case have "continued to hide that
exculpatory information for months—in direct contravention of this Court’s Order—and they continue to suppress exculpatory information to this day."
PDF: courtlistener.com/docket/6234142…
exculpatory information for months—in direct contravention of this Court’s Order—and they continue to suppress exculpatory information to this day."
PDF: courtlistener.com/docket/6234142…
Prosecutors in Flynn case produce exculpatory evidence in latest production but denied it was exculpatory.
Flynn's defense team has filed a sealed motion showing how the evidence was exculpatory.
Flynn's defense team has filed a sealed motion showing how the evidence was exculpatory.
Flynn lawyers hint that contempt findings and dismissal of prosecution would help remedy the conduct:
"Nothing will force the government to take its obligations seriously until individual prosecutors are held to account with findings of contempt and dismissals of prosecutions."
"Nothing will force the government to take its obligations seriously until individual prosecutors are held to account with findings of contempt and dismissals of prosecutions."
Flynn defense team cites Judge Betty Fletcher's concurring decision in case where exculpatory evidence was concealed.
Fletcher wrote that only a dismissal of the indictment would “impress upon the government the reprehensible nature of its acts and omissions.”
Fletcher wrote that only a dismissal of the indictment would “impress upon the government the reprehensible nature of its acts and omissions.”
