There is a reason people do not trust the media. A report is released. There is a certain set of facts, but this is how it is presented. 
The central allegation all along was Clinton mishandled classified information for a host of invented malign reasons. Now a probe by people put in place for the sole purpose of smearing Clinton still find there was no deliberate mishandling of information.
Rightwing news sites make much of 600 "incidents" ignoring that most were disregarded and brought down to 38 unnamed people. They mention some are no longer employed hoping you will infer Clinton but we know not Cilnton because of the Comey investigation that specified
the problematic emailsl from Clinton. This is the one they made so much brouhaha about, the one with the c) in the body, not the subject, so Clinton had an email she shoudl not have. They always describe the circumstance but ner show the email because (yawn)
I've read what Grassley put out. It does not tell us how many of those 600 "incidents" involve retroactively classified information or bullshit like the email that Comey et. al thought was a problem. Because it's so secret someone's dad died.
Anyway, much will be made of the number 600, a bit of candy for the conspiracy wing and little will be made of the conclusions - no systemic or deliberate effort to mishandle classified email
