I meant that as a joke. It wasn't directed at any person.
A defense witness yesterday used almost that exact example.
He took a Fireball shot and said he sipped from it for awhile.
*at charity event.
Hill said that means a person squeezing with intent on purpose. Did you do that? Absolutely not.
She testified he touched her again and said "that skin, that back."
DaSilva said she tried to nudge his hand away and he held both of their hands and moved them down to her butt.
He doesn't consider a person's back to be intimate area.
Were you hungover? No - I was tired.
(a) A person who, with intent to arouse or satisfy the person's own sexual desires or the sexual desires of another person:
(1) touches another person when that person is:
(A) compelled to submit to the touching by force or imminent threat of force;
(B) so mentally disabled or deficient that consent to the touching cannot be given; or
(2) touches another person's genitals, pubic area, buttocks, or female breast when that person is unaware that the touching is occurring;
commits sexual battery, a Level 6 felony.
(1) touches another person in a rude, insolent, or angry manner; or
(2) in a rude, insolent, or angry manner places any bodily fluid or waste on another person;
commits battery, a Class B misdemeanor.
I was in shock because I had no idea what they were talking about.
Asked if they had spoken to Tony Samuel - who he was with that night. No.
Bosma and Long wanted to inform Hill before they talked to the newspaper.
To the extent I did or said anything to make someone feel uncomfortable I apologize.
"I was concerned and really in desperate need to find out what had happened," he said.
Explained confidential memo from law firm hired including detailed allegations. They refused to give the memo to him.
"My attitude in the meeting started to change," he said.
Hill also notes the Taft law firm didn't investigate. Legislative staffers investigated then Taft gave legal opinion on that.
Once something gets in the public you can't put that back in the barn. He said he was not interviewed. It was all one-sided with no context.
Hill says he knows the name but not included the name in the record of this hearing.
And Bosma said yesterday "all the staff in the House are employed by me."
Example - memo refers to Rep. Reardon saying I took both hands and put both down her back and the dress and squeezing a handful of ass. And then again.
Even Reardon conceded there were inaccuracies.
He says no.
Hill questioned it. IG applied for a special prosecutor to review the case.
Sigler found there was insufficient evidence to charge Hill with a crime.
Commission Attorney Seth Pruden said opinion of one person is inadmissible and irrelevant. Invades province of hearing officer and Supreme Court.
*In layman's terms - just because one prosecutor didn't choose to go forward with criminal charges doesn't mean Hill is innocent.
See you at 1 p.m.
I did find one that referenced initial drafts of a press release defending Hill. It was from a campaign aide that said to "lose the word lynching" and any defense of Reardon
Hill denies saying that.
*Note - no one said he did.
Denies they were talking about sex, rather than dance.
Hill denies saying "we should fuck because it would be hot."
"Never," he says.
Hill says he said "we could've been fucking hot" in reference to the prior dance competition.
"I touched no one in a rude manner."
"I touched no one in an insolent manner."
"I touched no one at AJ's in an angry manner."
Says it wasn't his intention to be rude to anyone.
Did you use force? Absolutely not.
A - a notice of tort claim, Hill says.
*This is required to be filed before anyone can sue a government.
Hill - I don't think so.
In that statement he said he specifically quotes with Bosma and Long the battery statutes.
Hill - depends on context.
Pruden - if without consent is that not rude?
Hill - depends on context.
Pruden - are we talking about poopy diapers or touching women at a bar?
Hill says he may have touched her while talking but didn't rub her back.
Hill - I can't answer that without seeing what you are talking about.
Hill said the draft went into too much detail "in ways that are unnecessarily unflattering."
It was sent in November 2018.
It talks about pitching a story to conservative media that "Holcomb cronies and liberals are driving this?"
Hill - The allegations and the way in which it was handled and leaked to the press was vicious from a political standpoint.
ISC will make final decision.