Recently, I've been hearing a lot of the "bitcoin needs to be used as a unit of account and medium of exchange, store of value itself isn't a use-case/not enough" narrative being sold to newbies and veterans alike.
Let me explain.
Bitcoin is a tool to store, audit, and transport a measure of value within a vehicle that is immune to censorship, corruption and doesn’t bend to the wills of any country, organization, group, or individual.
It's a byproduct of a system that needs to create an incentive scheme from within the protocol instead of an external interest (e.g FB/Libra Association is motivated to keep Libra alive, Roger/Jihan on Bcash, etc).
Well, in order to keep Bitcoin as Bitcoin, there should not exist one or few dominant external interests to 'keep Bitcoin alive', else it opens up an ever-looming centralization risk.
E.g. post-DAO, when the Ethereum Foundation went "all aboard new ETH and fuck ETC", the effect it had on original ETH, now known as ETC was irrecoverably disastrous.
Wait, there will still be a place for shitcoins in the Bitcoin protocol suite.
Btw, good news for hodlers, bitcoin has to be worth a shit lot for Bitcoin to work.
End.