, 4 tweets, 3 min read
My Authors
Read all threads
NYT article claims that "experts" think Sanders' climate change plan is unscientific, implying it means experts on climate change. But actually quotes people like: a business school professor/maxed out Hillary donor and a former Hillary staffer & PR guy for the chemical industry
this is pure propaganda, nothing whatsoever to do with science. if you want a scientific assessment have climate scientists evaluate the plan. pretty galling that @nytimes doesn't disclose the obvious political biases of its sources.
@nytimes lol people in this article who ARE actual experts say the plan is good!!!
@nytimes hey @nytimes is it your usual practice in articles on climate change to decline to disclose that an "expert" has previously done PR for the chemical industry instead of just calling them a "democratic strategist"
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Enjoying this thread?

Keep Current with Current Affairs

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!