Kash Patel is suing POLITICO, its publisher, and @natashabertrand in VA state court.
"From the beginning of recorded time, the law has faithfully protected a person’s “absolute” right to an unimpaired reputation," his complaint says.
media.breitbart.com/media/2019/11/… via @bradheath
"From the beginning of recorded time, the law has faithfully protected a person’s “absolute” right to an unimpaired reputation," his complaint says.
media.breitbart.com/media/2019/11/… via @bradheath
@NatashaBertrand @bradheath What Patel alleges are POLITICO's "false statements and defamatory implications" are largely things other people affirmed in sworn testimony--to the effect that he's a very influential adviser to the president, incl on Ukraine, and he was key to Nunes's pushback against Mueller. 
@NatashaBertrand @bradheath "She is also a contributor to extreme left-wing programs, such as those broadcast by MSNBC."
I can't even.
I can't even.
@NatashaBertrand @bradheath @ericgeller The thing about this is the House Intel Committee released its transcripts, and they do show witnesses testifying about their understanding that Patel advised the president on Ukraine and gave him materials on Ukraine. Which is what Politico reported. See Fiona Hill's deposition.
