12/23: "No quid pro quo... The Democratic grounds for ousting President Trump are weak"
1/27: Bolton's claim is "nothing different than what we’ve already heard"
1/15: Quid pro quo allegations were "hearsay... people who had no direct evidence, witnesses who'd never even met President Trump"
1/27: On Bolton: "It doesn’t change the underlying facts"
1/24: Inhofe said the major problem with the case against Trump was that "not one of the witnesses… was a first-hand witness."
1/27: Calling Bolton (a first-hand witness) is just an effort to "string this thing out as long as they can"
9/26: Collins tweeted that there was "zero quid pro quo" in the case against Trump.
1/27: In response to Bolton's first-hand account of Trump admitting to a quid pro quo, Collins said, "the facts haven't changed."
10/3: Meadows told reporters that "we do know is there was definitely no quid pro quo."
1/27: Meadows called Bolton's first-hand account of a quid pro quo "a desperate attempt [by Democrats] to resusciate [sic] their dying political dreams."
It's like my twitter but with full sentences and original reporting.
Sign up ➡️ popular.info/subscribe
10/22: Hice tweeted that there was "no quid pro quo and no pressure."
1/27: Hice called Bolton's first-hand account of Trump admitting to a quid pro quo "hype," and asserted that "the basic facts stay the same."
10/21: Jordan tweeted: "It's been very clear. No quid pro quo."
1/27: Jordan tweeted that Bolton's account of the quid pro quo "doesn’t alter the… fundamental facts of the case."