, 11 tweets, 6 min read
My Authors
Read all threads
Right, I've been crunching the numbers to look at the relationship between #policeworkforce changes in police officer numbers and the likely allocation of the #20kuplift.

Strap yourselves in, it's very interesting and may get bumpy.

THREAD

1/
First to say that I've used the allocation of the first 6k of the 20kuplift, which uses the existing #fundingformula, to determine how many cops of the 20k each force may get. Details in the attachment to this written statement. parliament.uk/business/publi…

2/
I've then used the Mar 2019 #policeworkforce statistics to look at changes between 2010 and 2019.

NB: I am using the 31 Mar 2019 numbers as a proxy for the #20kuplift baseline b/c that's all we've got now. In reality the baseline nos will be different

3/
Here, then, is the #20kuplift (indicative) allocation using the current #fundingformula, expressed as a % increase on March 2019. Ranges from +21% in S Yorks to +12% in Dyfed-Powys, E&W avg 16%.

4/
Now let's look instead at the relationship between the numbers of officers (FTE) lost between 2010 and 2019, and the likely allocation under the #20kuplift. First all 43 forces: 21 'winners' and 22 'losers' - but hard to see the detail due to the big forces.

5/
So here's the same chart with the Met, WMP and GMP removed. Note Northumbria up at the top as a loser, Surrey at the bottom as a winner.

6/
Final chart, here's a summary of the likely #20kuplift allocation, as a % of the number of officers lost between 2010 and 2019. Again, Surrey the big winners, Cleveland bottom of the heap. #policeworkforce

7/
Here are the underlying numbers that I've used for all of the above. #policeworkforce #20kuplift

8/
Austerity has had a range of impacts beyond police officer nos, and forces have gone in different directions, but overall cuts were hardest in forces most reliant on the C Govt grant (Northumbria) and softest in those least reliant (Surrey).

9/
Looking at all of the above - and noting the allocations & baseline are indicative only - there seems to be a risk the #20kuplift will compound not address inequalities. Using the #fundingformula to allocate the 20k may be simple & politically expedient - but is it fair?

10/10
PS, here's some older analysis on workforce trends, including per 100k population (note that population growth has not been even across E&W) that might provide some useful context to the analysis above

11/
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Enjoying this thread?

Keep Current with Gavin Hales

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!