Apologies if this is tiresome, but I feel obligated to respond to a recent thread by @mulagostarr, head of a philanthropic foundation that funds many people I respect, publicly asserting my work with @marome1 is “unfair” and “misleading”.
This is false. Expulsions in year 1 were well documented in the media and RCT. But the RCT also found Bridge *further* harmed enrollment and dropout by year 3. It's an ongoing problem.
Let’s focus on the numbers, not adjectives. The ITT effect (0.19sd) is the same after one and three years. That means kids could read an additional 4 words per minute on average, and 5-8 additional words among the best operators.
Bridge openly declared its ambition to take over all 2,700 schools in Liberia. See their own slide deck. When we complained about using the RCT *baseline* to justify expansion, Kevin criticized us publicly.
The RCT lasted 3 years. The Liberian govt demanded data in year 1 to hold private operators accountable for their management of public schools. Kevin had other priorities.
Costs have fallen (see chart), which is great. Even so, average spending remains >$120/pupil (plus teacher salaries), so the program more than triples current spending on public schools. Meanwhile, Liberia can’t make payroll.
100% true, as we've noted. Nevertheless, we were dismayed to see the RCT results on test scores used as cover for MtM’s founder Katie Meyler after the fact.
Not for lack of trying. Despite the conflict of interest, Mulago didn't recuse itself on the board of IPA (@poverty_action) who ran the RCT with us, and @socfinuk and @bridgeintlacads wrote to our bosses and funders to impede us.
cgdev.org/sites/default/…
And replication data is here:
dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?…
/end