Thread by @Saintonge235

Here’s another case of people who can’t see the obvious because it would make them feel bad.

In this article from “Rolling Stone” magazine, rollingstone.com/politics/polit…,
Democrats agonize about electability. ‘What is it?’, they ask repeatedly. Fear not, I’m here to help.

Go to any map showing the state-by-state electoral results from 2016. You find that Hillary Clinton carried states with 232 electoral votes. You need 270 minimum to win. So we now know what electability is. Or at least I do, and I’ll share it with you.

Electability is holding the states Clinton won, while also carrying some states Clinton lost, states with at least thirty eight electoral votes total.

So, hold What Hillary Won (hereafter WHW), and take Wisconsin, Michigan, Indiana, and Maine Congressional District 2.

Or WHW, Pennsylvania, and Ohio.

Or WHW, Texas, and any other state.

Or WHW, the Carolinas, and GA.

(Democratic candidates in need, contact me about running your campaign. My fee will be in the seven figures, but for insight like this, it’s obviously worth it.)

And how do you do this? I have a plan, and you have to pay to see it, but I’ll throw out one teaser right now.

I’m sure you’ve observed that the #Trump supporters cling bitterly to their guns. To capture them, promise that in the first hundred days in office, you’ll . . .

find three gun laws presently in operation, and REPEAL them. If Congress won’t cooperate, well, you’ll have Obama’s pen and phone. Order the U.S. attorney’s not to prosecute those violating them. I guarantee you, you will win 270 with that alone.

(Really, I ought to charge eight figures, but I’m feeling compassionate. Hire me before someone else snatches me up.)