If he didn’t like it, he would’ve toned down his rhetoric after the first incident, or the tenth.
He’s a stochastic terrorist.
Stochastic terrorism gives the instigator the appearance of innocence. It’s the dog whistle of terrorism. But it’s terrorism.
That’s what he does with his words, and he *knows it*. He relishes it. He loves the idea of people committing violence for him.
This is a man who only yesterday crowed that bikers, cops and soldiers would make things “very bad, very bad” for the opposition party.
rollingstone.com/politics/polit…
nytimes.com/2018/11/03/mag…